Chicago’s ABC Channel 7 reported on April 6th:
Chicago’s ABC Channel 7 also reported:
According to the Associated Press on April 6th:
COLUMBUS, Ohio – Police in Ohio say a woman shot her cousin to death during an argument that started because one woman didn’t think the other was dressed properly for Easter dinner.
Columbus police say 19-year-old Danielle Pickens showed up Sunday night at the home of Evelyn Burgess wearing a T-shirt and jean shorts. Detective Steven Eppert says 42-year-old Burgess told officers she thought the outfit was inappropriate and disrespectful.
The women fought. Police say Pickens walked outside to leave and Burgess shot her in the head with a handgun. Pickens died at a hospital early Monday.
Eppert says Burgess told investigators she didn’t mean to shoot Pickens.
Burgess is to appear in court Tuesday on a murder charge. Court records don’t show an attorney for her.
According to the Associated Press on April 6th:
SEATTLE — A Washington state man has been charged with threatening to kill Democratic Sen. Patty Murray over her support for health care reform, leaving voicemail messages at her office saying she had a target on her back and “it only takes one piece of lead.”
Federal agents arrested Charles Alan Wilson without incident in Yakima, Wash., on Tuesday.
Murray’s office in Seattle reported the threats amid a rash of ugliness aimed at lawmakers who supported the sweeping federal health care legislation. Some lawmakers have been spit on and several have reported receiving threatening calls.
FBI spokesman Bill Carter said Wilson is believed to be the first person in the country arrested for such threats.
The messages to Murray were left on voicemail from a blocked telephone number, FBI Special Agent Carolyn W. Woodbury wrote in a probable cause statement. Agents said they traced the calls to Wilson’s home in Selah, near Yakima.
Wilson has a .38-caliber revolver registered to him and has a concealed carry permit for it, Woodbury wrote.
To confirm Wilson was the caller, one agent telephoned him and posed as a member of a group working to repeal the health care legislation, the statement said.
According to a excerpt of the conversation, Wilson confirmed he repeatedly called Murray as well as Washington’s other Democratic senator, Maria Cantwell.
He then stated: “I do pack, and I will not blink when I’m confronted. … It’s not a threat, it’s a guarantee.”
Murray’s office told the FBI it had been receiving harassing messages from the caller for months, but they became more threatening as Congress was voting on the health care legislation.
“There’s a target on your back now,” said one message on March 22. “It only takes one piece of lead. Kill the (expletive) senator! … Now that you’ve passed your health-care bill, let the violence begin.”
In other messages over the next several days, the caller said, “I hope somebody puts a (expletive) bullet between your (expletive) eyes,” and “I do believe that every one of you (expletive) socialist democratic progressive (expletives) need to be taken out.”
And, he said, “I want to (expletive) kill you.”
Wilson was scheduled to make an initial appearance at federal court in Yakima on Tuesday on one count of threatening a federal official. It was not immediately clear if he had obtained a lawyer. A phone call to his home went unanswered.
Murray’s office declined to comment on the arrest.
—
AP writer Devlin Barrett contributed from Washington, D.C. Shannon Dininny contributed from Yakima.
(We are pleased to post the following alert form CeaseFirePA).
Gun Violence Task Force is Working–but Needs Statewide Support
Because CeaseFirePA believes not only in reasonable reforms of our handgun laws, but also in enforcing those gun laws already on the books, our organization has begun a new courtroom monitoring project in collaboration with the Philadelphia Gun Violence Task Force to make sure illegal gun traffickers get sentences commensurate with the real harm they inflict on the city.
Thursday’s Philadelphia Inquirer featured a CeaseFirePA op-ed by board president Phil Goldsmith and executive director Joe Grace discussing the partnership and the new initiative. In some of the cases we have already monitored, illegally transferred handguns were later used in homicides, while many others are as yet unaccounted for.
In one case monitored by CeaseFirePA, Judge Ellen Ceisler said: “Twelve hundred gun deaths a year in Pennsylvania, the vast majority of those deaths committed with illegally obtained handguns. We have to send a message. There’s a war zone in our city. This must stop.” The straw purchaser in that case was sentenced to jail.
The Task Force has made a substantial dent in illegal gun trafficking in Philadelphia. Despite this success, its work is now threatened by state budget cuts–the budget approved by the state House last week would cut its funding by $2 million. That’s a 40 percent hit to a program that’s actually doing something about gun crime.
Not only should the General Assembly and Gov. Rendell restore the task force’s full funding, but CeaseFirePA has also asked every candidate for governor in this year’s election to support full funding of the task force and an expansion of the program to other communities across the state.
Read the full Philadelphia Inquirer Op-Ed
Pittsburgh Investigates Florida Loophole
Concern for the Florida concealed carry loophole has reached the western part of the state. In February, the Philadelphia Daily News reported that individuals who had their concealed carry permits denied or revoked in Pennsylvania could apply via mail for a permit through the Florida Department of Agriculture. This is because of a reciprocity agreement between the two states entered into by state Attorney General Tom Corbett.
Persons in Philadelphia and across Pennsylvania denied a permit to carry a concealed weapon are obtaining those permits by mail from Florida-and increasingly are being stopped by police in Pa. while carrying these Florida permits. Some of these individuals were in the course of committing other crimes when stopped, but gun charges can’t be brought because they possess a Florida permit.
This week, Pittsburgh Channel 4 (ABC Affiliate) reported that in western Pennsylvania, the number of Florida permits issued to Pa. residents now totals more than 400. Statewide, the number has grown by 500 in the past two months to more than 3,000. This bad reciprocity agreement stands the law on its head.
Attorney General Corbett should more strictly interpret this agreement between Pa. and Fla. to eliminate the “Florida loophole,” or revise the agreement to eliminate this threat to public safety.
Read the full news article on Pittsburgh Channel 4.
CeaseFirePA Welcomes Three New Board Members
A legal advocate, a doctor, and a marketing expert have all joined CeaseFirePA’s board of directors to aid our growing statewide effort to reduce access to illegal guns.Nancy Gordon, who has managed numerous local campaign and advocacy efforts; Keith Leaphart, D.O./MBA, president of Replica Creative: Design + Print; and Ed Tettemer, a renowned independent advertising and communications consultant, were recently elected directors of the organization.
Phil Goldsmith, CeaseFirePA board president, said: “Our organization is active now in 32 cities and towns across the state, and more municipalities and citizens join our coalition every day. Our board growth mirrors our important work statewide. The addition of Nancy Gordon, Keith Leaphart and Ed Tettemer to our board will enable us to continue strengthening CeaseFirePA and enhance our capacity to reach more Pennsylvanians with our commonsense message to reduce and prevent gun violence.”
Read the Philadelphia Inquirer board announcement.
Join us at Legs Against Arms on April 11
Come visit CeaseFirePA at the Legs Against Arms race on April 11 at St. Joe’s University-a walk/run to raise awareness for gun violence and illegal handguns. We will have an exhibitor table and hope you will come join the festivities following the race, which is hosted by Physicians for Social Responsibility and Magee Rehabilitation Hospital. If you are a runner or walker, you can register until April 7. The race starts at 8:30 a.m. and the festivities start at 10 a.m.-you don’t have to be a runner/walker to join in!
Sign up today for Legs Against Arms.
Every day, we are finding new ways to target illegal handguns and help keep them off the streets and out of communities across Pennsylvania. Now is the time to support our work with a donation as we continue our movement across Pennsylvania. We also encourage you to join us on Facebook–and encourage your friends, family and colleagues to as well–to add your thoughts to the discussion that is heating up. We remain focused every day on reducing and preventing gun violence in Pennsylvania, and we value your support.
Sincerely,
Joe Grace
Executive Director
CeaseFirePA
Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz says carrying loaded guns at his stores are at odds with his vision for the company, but punts his responsibility by falsely claiming that Starbucks is just following the law.
That’s simply not true Howard. Mr. Schultz and Starbucks could simply post signs and ban the carrying of guns inside Starbucks stores with the stroke of his pen.
In this Nightline interview, Schultz continually uses the word “values.”
Values? Really Howard? Exactly what are your “values” when you put your customers, employees and public at risk of getting shot and killed? Explain what kind of “values” do you and company abide by?
GunGuys was forwarded an excellent diary entry from one of our readers. The piece was written by Brainwrap, from the Daily Kos on April 2nd about the on-going threats of violence to elected officials.
Brainwrap succinctly connects the dots better than any major media outlet.
We’re posting the diary entry in full and give a tip of the hat to the Daily Kos community for addressing the fact that a resurgent right-wing movement is trying to erode our system of law and order and replace it with a code of violence — hence the NRA’s ideology.
Progressives simply must stand up and speak out about this extremist movement taking hold in our country.
Brainwrap writes:
Nope, this isn’t connected with other threats of violence in any way. Not at all (Detroit News):
Washington — The FBI is telling police across the country that an anti-government group’s call to remove governors from office — including Jennifer Granholm — could provoke violence by others.
A group that calls itself the Guardians of the free Republics wants to “restore America” by peacefully dismantling parts of the government, according to its Web site.
As of Wednesday, more than 30 governors had received letters saying if they don’t leave office within three days they will be removed, according to an internal intelligence note by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. The note was obtained by the Associated Press.
Investigators do not see threats of violence in the group’s message, but fear the broad call for removing top state officials could lead others to act out violently.
Really, you think???
No connection to Sean Hannity’s “Tim McVeigh wannabe” comment yesterday.
No connection to the rocks and bricks thrown through windows.
No connection to U.S. congressmen being spit upon and having racial & ethnic epithets screamed at them.
No connection to relatives of congressmen having their gas lines being severed.
No connection to people having their cars deliberately rear-ended, repeatedly, when they and their young children are in it, because they have an Obama bumper sticker on it.
No connection to “a thousand little Wacos” being threatened against the Speaker of the House.
No connection to people calling themselves “proud right-wing terrorists”.
No connection to Sarah Palin telling people to “reload” while displaying a map of rifle crosshairs centered over Democratic congressional districts.
No connection to “We came unarmed…this time” or “We’ll use the bullet box if we fail at the ballot box” signs.
No connection to pictures of Barack Obama depicted as Adolph Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Joseph Stalin or The Joker.
No connection to Joseph Stack, who deliberately flew his plane into an IRS building and murdered an innocent man.
No connection to the Hutaree terrorist group who was arrested last week for planning to murder dozens of police officers.
None whatsoever, I’m sure.
Update: For those who are still debating whether Sean Hannity was attempting to be sarcastic or not: Perhaps he was, and just botched it badly (I didn’t hear any ironic voice inflection, but that’s just me).
HOWEVER, I’m sure that it’s just a coincidence that the Tea Party’s huge, overhyped “Freedom Rally” just happens to be scheduled for April 19.
Let’s see, what else happened on April 19?
No connection whatsoever…none at all…
According to the Kansas City Star on March 31st:
JEFFERSON CITY | It’s been a quiet week in Jefferson City.
Legislators writing laws. Debating the budget.
Training with handguns.
About 16 Missouri lawmakers — along with several legislative staffers and at least one representative’s wife — are taking a firearms-training course sponsored by the bipartisan “Sportsmen’s Caucus” that will qualify them for concealed weapons permits.
Tuesday’s lesson plan? Proper firearm care and cleaning.
“You need to bring your weapon tonight,” read a reminder sent out over the House e-mail system. “No ammo will be needed. Pizza and soda will be served.”
Missouri, like most states, allows people to carry concealed weapons if they pass a training course and register with a law enforcement agency. This week, lawmakers took steps to extend that privilege into the corridors of the Capitol.
On the same day of the lawmakers’ firearms class, the House gave first-round approval to a bill that would expressly allow legislators, their aides and employees to carry concealed weapons in the statehouse.
“If you stay up with your news and what’s going on in the world, you know bad things happen all over the place,” said Rep. Jeanie Riddle, a Mokane Republican who sponsored the amendment that added the Capitol language. “It would be nice for us to not be a statistic.”
State law now bars most people — including state employees — from bringing a deadly weapon into the Capitol. Lawmakers who hold a concealed-carry permit, however, are exempt from the prohibition.
Riddle said it was only fair to extend that privilege to others who work in the building, which no longer has metal detectors but has a Capitol police force.
“My life isn’t any more important than anyone else’s who works here, so to offer them the same opportunity I think is the right thing to do,” Riddle said.
The measure was included in a broader firearms bill that would drop the age limit for a concealed-carry permit from 23 to 21, and expand the “Castle Doctrine” to allow people who rent their homes to use deadly force against intruders.
The bill passed on a 125-19 vote.
But not everyone thinks lawmakers and their staffers should be packing heat in the halls of government.
“I think it’s incredibly shortsighted for so many people who are not even elected by the public to bring guns into the Capitol, (especially) so many people who often are immature and feel very passionate about their positions,” said Rep. Mary Still, a Columbia Democrat who voted against the bill.
But even some opponents of the legislation were not especially concerned with the provisions relating to the Capitol. More troubling, they said, was the proposed lowered age limit for concealed-carry permits.
“I know there are a lot of people that bring weapons into the statehouse. I can’t help that. It’s their right and privilege under the law,” said Rep. Tom McDonald, an Independence Democrat. “But extending that to 21-year-olds and giving kids that age the privilege to carry a gun leads to bigger problems.”
The firearms legislation must still win a second vote in the House before moving to the Senate for further consideration. Yet even if it fails, Missouri’s Capitol is still more welcoming to weapons than Kansas and some other states.
In Kansas, firearms — concealed or otherwise — are not allowed in the statehouse or in most other government buildings. State law does not prohibit the open carrying of firearms, so cities without local bans, such as Topeka, allow citizens to wear holstered firearms in public — though not in the statehouse.
(We are pleased to post the following commentary from Josh Horwitz, Executive Director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence. Mr. Horwitz’s piece was first published on the Huffington Post on March 31st).
During the past two weeks, at least ten House Democrats who voted for health care reform legislation have received death threats or been targets of vandalism at their district offices. Several have moved their families out of their home districts to Washington. Both the U.S. Capitol Police and the FBI are taking the situation very seriously and have offered increased security protection to these Members.
There has been a lot speculation as to how we’ve reached the point where violence is now being promoted as an acceptable response to democratically-enacted legislation. The truth is that political developments over the past three decades have made such violence tragically inevitable.
The idea that individual Americans have a right to use violence when confronted with oppressive or overbearing government dates back to the Battles of Lexington and Concord in 1775. There is no doubt that our War of Independence was violent and that firearms were part of the necessary tools of victory.
Our Founders, however, never intended revolution to be either perpetual or an individual exercise. They made that perfectly clear in 1787 with the drafting of the Constitution.
The Founders came to Philadelphia to begin work on a new governing document because of the fear of disunion and mobocracy that had gripped our young nation (Shay’s Rebellion being just one example). The Federalists who drafted the Constitution and the Bill of Rights had no intention of creating an individual right to insurrection divorced from any organized authority. The Constitution itself stated that one of the primary purposes of the [State] Militia was to “suppress insurrections”–not foment them–and defined treason against the federal government as a crime punishable by death.
The insurrectionist idea was discredited again during the Civil War, when President Lincoln affirmed that our Constitution is not a suicide pact and can never countenance violence against the state. Nearly a century later, Republican President Dwight Eisenhower embraced Lincoln’s view when he used the National Guard to prevent unruly mobs from obstructing the desegregation of Little Rock High School in Arkansas.
Of course, there have always been a small minority of Americans–even at the time of our nation’s founding–who feared the consolidation of power in the government and believed the use of force was a legitimate response to federal encroachments. When the National Rifle Association (NRA) took a hard turn to the right after the 1977 “Cincinnati Revolution,” the organization’s leadership targeted this constituency by injecting the insurrectionist idea into our national political conscience.
From the 1980s on, the NRA has expended significant resources promoting the idea in academic and political circles that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms for the express purpose of “preventing government tyranny.”
Perhaps this viewpoint is best epitomized by NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre’s assertion that “the guys with the guns make the rules” in our democracy.
This was a wonderful recruiting and fundraising strategy for the NRA–attracting Libertarians, gun rights extremists, and others with a deep distrust of government. But the gun lobby wasn’t the only entity seeking to appeal to the Limited Government constituency, and beginning with Reagan, the Republican Party increasingly began to portray government as a hostile, alien entity that serves only to restrict and deny the individual freedoms of Americans.
Simultaneously, the GOP actively began to court gun rights activists that embrace the NRA’s insurrectionist precept. When Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City in 1995, this political marriage lost some of its appeal, but only temporarily.
Following the election of a progressive, intellectual, African-American, Democratic president in 2008, the GOP saw an opportunity to expand its beleaguered base by reaching deeper into the insurrectionist community. In an act of political expediency aimed at defeating the Democrats’ push for health care reform, the GOP forged an alliance with the Tea Party Movement.
It also redoubled its efforts to satisfy the NRA and other gun rights groups–even drafting and promoting legislation to exempt the States from all federal firearms regulation.
This new alliance was emboldened by the Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark Second Amendment case District of Columbia v. Heller. While most people know Heller as the case that struck down D.C.’s handgun ban, language in the 5-4 decision seemed to embrace the NRA’s insurrectionist idea and give license to individuals to take up arms against our government.
“In the majority opinion, Justice Scalia wrote, If…the Second Amendment right is no more than the right to keep and use weapons as a member of an organized militia…if, that is, the organized militia is the sole institutional beneficiary of the Second Amendment’s guarantee -it does not assure the existence of a ‘citizens’ militia’ as a safeguard against tyranny.”
Unfortunately, thousands (if not millions) of Americans in the Republican base believe the current administration is “tyrannical,” and the GOP quickly lost control of the monster it helped to create. Armed protesters began to show up at health care town hall meetings and presidential speeches with loaded handguns and assault rifles. Calls for Nullification and Secession were heard from Red State politicians. And anti-government zealots began to attack government offices, culminating in the recent spate of political violence following the House’s approval of health care legislation.
These are dangerous times for our nation. House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn, who recently received a fax with a drawing of a noose, saw the pattern and noted, “If we fail to learn the lessons of our history, we are bound to repeat them.” Referring to the former Alabama militia leader who took credit for this month’s vandalism of Democratic offices, Heidi Beirich of the Southern Poverty Law Center said, “The ideas that [Mike] Vanderboegh’s militia groups were pushing were the same extreme anti-government ideas that inspired McVeigh in the Oklahoma City bombing.”
Ultimately, whether it’s by brick or gun or bomb doesn’t matter. The most important idea in American political philosophy is that of equality; that one citizen’s vote is as important as the next. When violence is used to undermine that principle, it corrodes our basic democratic institutions, including the rule of law.
Republicans and their allies–including the NRA–should be unequivocal in denouncing political violence. They should make it clear that not only is such violence criminal, but also anathema to the system of constitutional government created by our Founders. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) deserves credit for telling his base that “violence and threats are unacceptable” and “not the American way.” But it’s unlikely to help if he continues to describe the Democratic agenda as “Armageddon.”
The same goes for Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele who–after threats were reported– described the signing of health care legislation as “the end of representative government” and said of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: “This woman has been derelict in her leadership duty to the country by not listening, by taking…the country down a bad road. And this November, they’re going to pay. So let’s start getting Nancy ready for the firing line this November.” And then there was Sarah Palin’s admonition to her followers: “Don’t Retreat, Instead – RELOAD!”
At some point, Republicans need to accept that Barack Obama won the presidency not through a “coup,” but through good old-fashioned hard work and the appeal of his platform. You can’t overturn the results of our democratic process with violence when you are not satisfied with those results. Republicans should reject over-the-top rhetoric and stick with what really works–organizing, campaigning, and most of all, good governance. That, after all, is the American Way.
(We are pleased to post the following column from Josh Sugarmann, Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center. Mr. Sugarmann’s piece was originally published on the Huffington Post on March 30th).
Norman Leboon–the 38-year-old Northeast Philadelphia man recently charged with threatening the life of House Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA)–was, according to the brother of Leboon’s live-in partner, a “giant loon.” Leboon was also a concealed handgun permit holder.
As reported by the Philadelphia Inquirer:
Peter Leboon was concerned because his brother [Norman], who he said began showing signs of mental instability three years ago, had a permit to carry a concealed weapon.”The last time I tried to get him help, we searched the whole house, six or seven of us, we couldn’t find the gun,” Peter Leboon said. “I found the permit, though, and destroyed it. Whatever happened to that gun, who knows?”
Or as a neighbor told the Inquirer: “For the past two years, he’s been off his rocker….I’ve called the cops plenty of times.”
The threats and crimes comitted by these “upstanding citizens,” as the gun lobby likes to call concealed handgun permit holders, are no surprise. You can check the Violence Policy Center’s Concealed Carry Killers website to see the most recent killings by concealed handgun permit holders (151 since May 2007, including nine dead law enforcement officers).
What is surprising (but becoming less and less so) are the number of grotesque high-profile incidents–from mass shootings to the murder of law enforcement, and now a threat to kill a Member of Congress–in which it’s eventually revealed that the protaganist is a concealed handgun permit holder.
With that in mind, does anyone want to take odds on these folks?

Such revelations regarding concealed handgun permit holders are often the result of a reporter who just happens to ask the right question since such information is extremely difficult to obtain as the result of the gun lobby’s successful “ignorance is bliss” legislative strategy when it comes to information on gun violence.
Now granted, the pro-concealed carry crowd will blame either the police–literally another frequent target of permit holders–or Leboon’s family for this incident.
After all, it’s the job of the gun lobby and gunmakers to get as many guns into the hands of as many people as possible. It’s everyone else’s job to clean up after their mess.
Via the Huffington Post on March 30th:
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg — who at one point was considered an Independent ally of the White House but has proven to be a somewhat reliable critic — is going hard after the president, accusing Obama of dragging his feet on gun control.
In a letter sent earlier this month from his coalition — Mayors Against Illegal Guns — Bloomberg comes intriguingly close to assigning blame for ongoing gun violence to the Obama administration. The mayor and his co-signer, Boston Mayor Thomas Menino, point to a separate report they sent the administration in early August 2009, which laid out 40 recommendations to “improve enforcement of existing gun laws” that simply required enforcing existing statutes.
That report was apparently given only a perfunctory response from the Department of Justice and little tangible political action — prompting a harsh follow-up letter from Bloomberg and Menino.
“We appreciate the Department’s consideration of the report, but this is an urgent matter: further delay will almost certainly result in the needless loss of innocent lives, including many children. Mr. President, the time has come for action,” the mayors write. “Over the past six months, approximately 6,000 Americans have been gunned down in intentional acts of violence. The 40 recommendations in our Blueprint, many of which could be enacted immediately, offer the best hope we have for making our country safer over the next six months – and the years ahead.”
The authors go on to point to specific recommendations that they argue could have proven invaluable in preventing or stemming some of the recent cases of gun-related violence — such as the shooting of two Pentagon police officers earlier this month. Specifically, they cite the need for better information-sharing methods for law enforcement units and “proactive enforcement and undercover operations” by the ATF.
“Had [these recommendations] been implemented,” Bloomberg and Menino write. “ATF would have undertaken proactive enforcement and undercover operations to identify problematic gun shows and the sellers who break the law at those shows.”
The White House did not immediately return a request for comment.In all, the letter is telling as much for what it says about the president’s somewhat frayed relationship with Bloomberg (who was sought out for advice on both health care reform and civilian trials for 9/11 terrorists — both of which he ended up opposing), as for what it says about the White House’s approach to the gun control debate.
The president and his team have made what appears to be a tacit decision to keep their distance from Second amendment issues — undoubtedly wary of how politically divisive it can be.
And while the strategy has helped dispel the always-erroneous notion that Obama was hell-bent on taking away people’s guns, it’s also earned the administration a host of critiques from editorial boards to gun-control advocates — who argue that the political will is there for basic but important reforms.
“In your recent State of the Union Address, you reminded Congress, rightly, that the American people sent you to Washington to take on the tough issues – to worry about the next generation, not the next election,” writes Bloomberg and Menino. “But not all issues that are controversial in Washington are controversial in the rest of the country.”
“We respectfully request a meeting with you and the Attorney General to discuss how these reforms can be implemented over the next several months.”
Here is the full letter:
According to the Philadelphia Inquirer on March 30th:
A Northeast Philadelphia man was charged with threatening the life of a Virginia congressman and his family in an Internet video that he studded with Old Testament references and in which he referred to the “final Yom Kippur.”
Norman Leboon, 38, of the 1600 block of Benner Street in Mayfair, was charged by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Philadelphia with two counts involving threats against U.S. Rep. Eric Cantor, the Republican House whip.
Leboon was arrested Saturday by the FBI, three days after his YouTube video was seen by someone in San Francisco and reported to the FBI.
Although Leboon called Cantor “my congressman” in his homemade video, there seems to be no evidence Leboon has ever lived anywhere but Philadelphia and its suburbs.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert K. Reed said Cantor and his family were not harmed as a result of Leboon’s alleged activities. Reed added that there was no evidence that Leboon was involved in the shot fired at Cantor’s local office in Richmond after last week’s vote on health insurance reform.
Leboon’s brother, Peter, said yesterday that his brother’s behavior had become so erratic in recent months that he also had notified the FBI after Norman Leboon posted one antigovernment YouTube rant.
“They dismissed it as no big deal,” Peter Leboon said.
Peter Leboon said he tried several times to have his brother committed to a mental institution, most recently before Christmas.
Leboon said his brother had lived in Mayfair for six years and before that in Lansdowne.
Peter Leboon was concerned because his brother, who he said began showing signs of mental instability three years ago, had a permit to carry a concealed weapon.
Check out the Violence Policy Center’s on-line tool, “CCW Killers,” about homicides committed by concealed handgun permit holders.
The VPC press release states:
Washington, DC--Concealed handgun permit holders have killed at least nine law enforcement officers in addition to 142 private citizens (including 15 shooters who killed themselves after an attack) since May 2007 according to the latest update of Concealed Carry Killers, a Violence Policy Center (VPC) on-line resource that tallies news reports of such killings.
The web site, located at http://www.vpc.org/ccwkillers.htm, is updated monthly to include new fatal shootings since May 2007 by concealed handgun permit holders and any changes in the legal status of permit holders facing criminal charges. (Any concealed handgun permit holders who are eventually acquitted of their alleged crimes are not included in the tallies maintained on the site although the facts surrounding the shooting are detailed.)
Watch this vid-cast from FactCheck.org on President Obama’s record on gun control.
Clearly the NRA has no interest in telling the truth and is more comfortable saying anything it wants regardless whether there is any shred of truth. The gun lobby has proved that it pays to be shameless by manipulating the public and its members by straight out lying.
We might disagree on the issues, even gun control. But GunGuys doesn’t like being lied to — so matter who does it.
It’s astonishing that so many members of Congress actually take the NRA and gun lobby seriously, much less the media.
Watch Video
This video below from the Hutaree’s own website shows the militia training in the woods and completing war exercises. Clearly, the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force was right in raiding the extremist militia and arresting 9 of its members to prevent a massacre or an attack on law enforcement.
This footage is all the more reason why Congress and the Obama administration must push for a comprehensive federal assault weapons ban. As this video clearly shows, there are untold numbers of domestic terrorists who want to fight a war with the government.
But the truth is that these “weekend warriors” are acting out the very ideology and rhetoric by the NRA and gun lobby — that any restriction on guns, even military-style assault weapons, will lead to a totalitarian state and that Americans need the military-style weaponry to fight our own government if need be.
Instead of looking at militias, such as the Hutaree, as some kind of an outlier, maybe it’s takes to confront the gun lobby about it’s rhetoric that they do in fact support and enable domestic terrorism.
It’s only when a militia is raided by the FBI that suddenly the NRA goes very, very quiet. Suddenly, their extreme ideology and rhetoric doesn’t look so appealing.
Hutaree Training Video
(We are pleased to post the following press release from the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence).
For Immediate Release
Contact: Thom Mannard (312) 341-0939, tmannard@ichv.org
(March 29, 2010, Chicago) – An FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force arrested seven men and one woman — another suspect is still being sought — in Michigan, Ohio, Illinois and Indiana as “part of an investigation into an Adrian-based unit of the Hutaree, a group that professes it is training in modern armed combat techniques for a prophesized coming battle with the Antichrist,” according to the Associated Press.
The federal court indictment states, “The HUTAREE’s enemies include state and local law enforcement, which are deemed ‘foot soldiers’ of the Federal government, Federal law enforcement agencies and employees, participants in the ‘New World Order,’ and anyone who does not share in the HUTAREE’s beliefs. Since at least 2008, the HUTAREE has been meeting regularly to conduct military-style training in Lenawee County….The purpose of this training has been to plan and prepare for the impending war with the HUTAREE’s enemies.”
The militia’s grisly plans are noted on page 4 of the federal court indictment: “The general concept of operations provided that the HUTAREE would commit some violent act to draw the attention of law enforcement or government officials and which would prompt a response by law enforcement. Possible such acts which were discussed including killing a member of law enforcement after a traffic stop, killing a member of law enforcement and his or her family at home, ambushing a member of law enforcement in rural communities, luring a member of law enforcement with a false 911 emergency call and then killing him or her, and killing a member of law enforcement and then attacking the funeral procession motorcade with weapons of mass destruction. These acts would intimidate and demoralize law enforcement diminishing their ranks and rendering them ineffective.”
In response, Thom Mannard, Executive Director of the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence (ICHV), issued the following statement:
“It is disturbing to read today that a Christian cult and militia sought to arm themselves with deadly weapons and to train its members to kill other people, including law enforcement officials, based on a sick and twisted interpretation of the Christian faith. This FBI raid is yet more proof that hate groups, cults and militias in our nation can easily arm themselves with some of the most deadly weapons available, such as military-style assault weapons, powerful handguns and other dangerous weapons of mass destruction.
“Congress and the Obama administration must act to address the terrorism threat enabled by America’s weak gun laws. America’s safety and security continues to be at grave risk until we ban the sale of all military-style assault weapons, such as AK-47s and .50 caliber sniper rifles, and require criminal background checks on every firearm sold. Ultimately, comprehensive federal legislation must be enacted to address this danger and improve homeland security.
“Illinois state lawmakers do not have to wait for Congress to act to limit the access and threat of deadly assault weapons. Pending legislation SB 3036 sponsored by Senator Antonio Munoz, and HB 5751 sponsored by Representative Edward Acevedo should be acted on immediately.
“ICHV believes it is imperative to protect our communities from the proliferation of these deadly weapons into our communities. The easy access to military-style assault weapons undermines our public safety and our personal security. This FBI raid against a well-armed militia should act as a wake-up to lawmakers to take action to prevent a potential domestic terrorist attack.
“Finally, we urge all members of the faith community to speak out more fervently against any group that uses religion to justify acts of violence.”
The Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence (www.ichv.org) is a statewide organization working to reduce gun violence through education, advocacy and public awareness.
– END –
According to the Detroit News on March 29th:
Federal prosecutors plan to unseal charges today against members of a self-described Christian militia arrested Saturday and Sunday in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois.
At least seven people were taken into custody in raids by an FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force as part of an investigation into an Adrian-based unit of the Hutaree, a group that professes it is training in modern armed combat techniques for a prophesized coming battle with the Antichrist.
The suspects are expected to make an initial appearance in U.S. District Court in Detroit today, according to federal authorities, who declined to discuss the charges behind the multistate arrests.
“Jesus wanted us to be ready to defend ourselves using the sword and stay alive using equipment …,” one of the group’s purported leaders wrote on its Web site. “We, the Hutaree, are prepared to defend all those who belong to Christ and save those who aren’t. We will still spread the word, and fight to keep it, up to the time of the great coming.”
The group’s insignia, worn as a patch on military camouflage uniforms, is a cross-shaped sword and the letters CCR for Colonial Christian Republic. The Hutaree Web site features links to conservative Christian news outlets along with photos and videos of combat training sessions under the banner, “Preparing for the end time battles to keep the testimony of Jesus Christ alive.” ………..
A member of the controversial Michigan Militia said Sunday that the Hutaree is a nationwide organization with an ardent following in Adrian, 10 miles from the Ohio border just west of Detroit. “Their philosophy and ours differ in many ways, so we don’t do a whole lot with them. They are too extreme or radical for us,” said Jim Gulliksen, coordinator of the Lenaway Volunteer Michigan Militia with membership of about a dozen in the Adrian area. “I just kind of got a bad feeling about the group and we did not want to associate with them. They are a little too paranoid for me.”
Mike Lackomar of Michiganmilitia.com said he heard from other militia members that the FBI targeted the Hutaree after its members made threats of violence against Islamic organizations. Lackomar said the members of the Southeast Michigan Volunteer Militia and Michiganmilitia.com weren’t arrested.
“Last night and into today (Sunday), the FBI conducted a raid against homes belonging to the Hutaree. They are a religious cult. They are not part of our militia community,” Lackomar said.
Lackomar said he was told there were five arrests Saturday and another five early Sunday. The FBI declined to comment.
One of the Hutaree members called a Michigan militia leader for assistance Saturday after federal agents already had began their raid, Lackomar said, but the militia member — who is of Islamic decent and had heard about the threats — declined to offer help. That Michigan militia leader is now working with federal officials to provide information on the Hutaree member for the investigation, Lackomar said Sunday.
“They are more of a survivalist group, and in an emergency, they withdraw and stand their ground. They are actively training to be alongside Jesus,” he said.
Gulliksen said he heard about the raids when he was in church Sunday morning. He immediately contacted local law enforcement, “to make sure they knew we weren’t really affiliated with Hutaree.”
Gulliksen said he believes national security tensions are high and the FBI may well be focusing on conservative groups because of anger over the federal overhaul of health care.
“A few months ago, I believe one of their (Hutaree) members down South was arrested on some sort of weapons charge,” Gulliksen said. “Everything is getting a little nervous right now with all the threats against congressmen and all.”
Law enforcement swarmed a rural, wooded property Saturday evening near Adrian, neighbors said. Two ramshackle trailers sat side-by-side on the property, the door to one slightly ajar late Sunday, as if it had been forced open.
Phyllis Brugger, who has lived in the area for more than 30 years, said some people who lived there were known as having ties to militia. They would shoot guns and often wore camouflage, according to Brugger and her daughter, Heidi Wood.
“Everybody knew they were militia,” Brugger said. “You don’t mess with them.”
About a month ago, 50 vehicles showed up on the property, and the women said neighbors assumed something bad was going on.
The leader of the local group, Gulliksen said, is a man who goes by RD Merzonik on the group’s Web site.
“I’ve met him. He’s an opinionated man who likes to share those opinions,” Gulliksen said. “The Hutaree is a nationwide group, but I have met a couple of the members here and I can say they all belong to one specific church. Our concern is the protection of our nation. Religion appears to be a big part of what they are doing.”
Muslims shocked
Hutaree members use nicknames sometimes linked to their rank, within an elaborate system for Hutaree soldiers that includes titles such as “Radok, Boramander, Zulif, Arkon, Rifleman and Lukmore.” A parable for commanders suggests, “You may be a leader of flesh but in heaven, leaders are of spirit.”Sources from the Michigan militia community said one of the FBI raids took place Saturday during a wake for a Hutaree member who had died of natural causes. A Hutaree leader was arrested during the wake while agents were conducting raids.
Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on Islamic-American Relations of Michigan, made an announcement Sunday during the group’s anniversary banquet about receiving a call from a journalist about the alleged threat against Muslims.
“Don’t allow this news to scare you away from practicing your faith,” Walid said.
Gasps were heard throughout the banquet hall when the news was announced. Walid said he will call local authorities about more information on the allegations. He urged local Muslims to recommit themselves to their faith in light of the accusations.
The Southern Poverty Law Center recently reported a resurgence in politically motivated militias, which emerged in the 1980s under perceived threats to conservative rights and conspiracies about a United Nations takeover when President George H.W. Bush spoke of a “New World Order.”
Militia groups came into the national spotlight in 1995, after the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City. Michigan native Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh were convicted in the bombing, which killed 168 people. Nichols and McVeigh attended Michigan Militia events, a group which believes citizens have constitutional authority to organized an armed force. The Michigan militia denied Nichols and McVeigh were members.
Militia popularity declined during the administration of President George W. Bush, but the Southern Poverty Law Center claims the number of groups espousing anti-government doctrines and political conspiracy theories is again rising with anxiety over a perceived liberal agenda of President Barack Obama. The report identified 512 groups throughout the country, including 47 in Michigan, second to Texas, with 52.
The Associated Press and Staff Writers David Shepardson and Oralandar Brand-Williams contributed.
From The Detroit News: http://www.detnews.com/article/20100329/METRO/3290334/1409/Militia-members-arrested-in-Sunday-raid-to-be-charged-today#ixzz0jZfikRBt
In Politico’s “The Arena” on March 26th, the site asked: “Do Democrats have legitimate gripes about GOP rhetoric they claim is ‘fanning the flames’ of anger?”
Politico’s question was unfortunately couched in a “how will this play politically” frame. Instead, the website should give much more weight to how such inflammatory rhetoric can lead to violence. What’s troubling is the inability of most pundits to take seriously the violent statements from right-wing organizations, hate radio, and sadly, the leadership of the Republican Party in response to the health care reform bill.
These coded and direct threats are a direct assault on the very definition of the rule of law. The message being sent is that violence is the corrective action versus using a democratic and political process.
Luckily, thoughtful commentators such as Sherrilyn Ifill, a professor of law at the University of Maryland School of Law, and a civil rights lawyer, call it what it is:
Let’s dispense with the false Republican/Democrat symmetry that has become the only lens through which we view events in Washington.
There is no symmetry here.
The rhetoric of Republican leaders – replete with hunting metaphors, cross-hair icons, and other veiled references to violence – whether perpetrated by Sarah Palin, Michael Steele or Republicans in Congress – cannot be compared with Democratic leadership, even during the dark days of George W. Bush, when there was a real assault on the Constitution in the name of national security (as the Supreme Court later confirmed in several cases).
Code Pink and Cindy Sheehan did not walk around at rallies brandishing rifles, nor did anti-war and anti-Bush activists carry signs that suggested that a gun could solve the problems that politics cannot.
Nor did they wear T-shirts quoting the language used as a call to action by Timothy McVeigh and other violent groups. I know of no instance in which members of Congress who supported the Patriot Act were spat upon by leftist visitors to the Capitol.
The history of right-wing violence in this country over the last 50 years cannot be denied.
Yes, there’s been some violence on the left. But most Americans had never heard of the Weather Underground until the Bill Ayers flap during Obama’s campaign. But we all know the names James Earl Ray, Timothy McVeigh, Eric Rudolph. And we know many of the victims – from civil rights activists to doctors who provide abortions. There’s a reason for that — and it’s not because of liberal media bias.
There has been a long and disturbing history of right-wing violence in this country.
Both Republicans and Democrats know this history. Republicans and Democrats should stand together and denounce any explicit or implicit calls to violence. That some Republican leaders are irresponsibly ignoring this reality, and through their rhetoric fanning the flames of outrage among their most zealous and potentially dangerous supporters, is beyond shocking.
And when we decide that this is simply another matter in which we seek to balance the scales between Republicans and Democrats, we ignore the growing threat to the stability of our country and the safety of our leaders. On this we should be united.
The Associated Press reported on March 26th:
WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Friday upheld limitations on gun ownership that the District of Columbia put in place following a 2008 Supreme Court decision overturning the city’s outright ban on handguns.
Dick Heller, the plaintiff in the landmark Supreme Court case, had challenged the new regulations, claiming the registration procedures, a ban on most semiautomatic weapons and other limitations violated the intent of the high court’s decision.
U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina sided with the city, saying the Supreme Court decision did not ban reasonable limits on gun ownership designed to promote public safety.
“While the (Supreme) Court recognized that the Second Amendment protects a natural right of an individual to keep and bear arms in the home in defense of self, family and property, it cautioned that that right is not unlimited,” he wrote.
The decision by Urbina, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton, moves the case along what is likely to be a lengthy path through the legal system.
“We fully expect to go the Court of Appeals,” said Heller’s lawyer Richard E. Gardiner.
Urbina’s opinion “misinterprets Heller altogether,” Gardiner said, referring to the Supreme Court decision. In particular, he took issue with the judge’s observation that the Supreme Court did not explicitly declare the Second Amendment right to be “fundamental.”
“It’s clearly a fundamental right because it’s in the Bill of Rights,” Gardiner said.
The Supreme Court struck down a 32-year-old ban on handguns in Washington and a requirement that all firearms, including rifles and shotguns, be kept disassembled or bound by a trigger lock. In the wake of the ruling, the D.C. Council moved quickly to pass new regulations.
The plaintiffs claimed the new process for registering guns — which includes fingerprinting, vision tests, background checks and other requirements, and which limits people to registering one pistol per month — was too burdensome.
But Urbina found the process served “the well-established goal of promoting public safety.”
The plaintiffs also challenged the city’s ban on assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices.Urbina said the Supreme Court made clear the Second Amendment doesn’t protect ownership of “dangerous or unusual” weapons.
Heller, a security guard, brought the suit that ended up in the Supreme Court after the city rejected his application to keep a handgun at his Capitol Hill home. Under the current regulations, he was denied registration of certain firearms because they are categorized as assault weapons. Three other D.C. residents joined him in the suit.
Advocates Challenge Starbucks At Shareholders Meeting For Irresponsible Policy To Permit ‘Open-Carry’ Of Loaded Handguns At Stores
CCW Killers On-Line Tool From Violence Policy Center
Kristen Rand, legislative director for the Violence Policy Center, a gun-control group, said the movement “has to do with selling more guns.” While it was pushed by groups like the NRA, it also “dovetailed with the gun industry’s desperate need to find a new market.”
“Their efforts at reaching out to minorities and women have failed,” said Rand, whose group advocates banning all handguns and some rifles but believes sporting rifles and shotguns should remain legal. “The industry constantly has to look for a way to make a guy who already owns 15 guns buy a new one.”
States United Featured Campaign: “Meet Wayne!” By Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort, Advocating For Criminal Background Checks On All Gun Sales
News
Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus
According to TPM on March 24th — see image below:
*******
Sarah Palin posted a picture on her Facebook page this week showing cross hairs over the districts of Democrats who voted for health care reform in districts that Republicans carried.
On the page, Palin writes:
With the president signing this unwanted and “transformative” government takeover of our health care system today with promises impossible to keep, let’s not get discouraged. Don’t get demoralized. Get organized!
Palin also tweeted the page:
Don’t Get Demoralized! Get Organized! Take Back the 20!
Commonsense Conservatives & lovers of America: “Don’t Retreat, Instead – RELOAD!” Pls see my Facebook page.

On her MSNBC show on March 24th, Rachel Maddow took on the hateful, violent and threatening rhetoric of the right wing — sadly enabled by the Republican party — after the landmark health care reform vote in Congress this week.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

According to the Huffington Post on March 24th:
Gilbert Arenas is still suffering the consequences from his guilty plea to a felony gun charge.
In addition to missing out on the rest of the NBA season, the Wizards guard saw a major marketing deal go up in flames. Until now, however, fans have not seen the guns that got him in so much trouble.
Arenas, who says he once owned 500 firearms, has not yet been sentenced, although prosecutors are seeking a three-month jail term.
As part of the proceedings, lawyers released photos of several Arenas guns. Scroll down.

A disturbing video was posted by Mark Berman at Opposing Views:
A prank at a wedding in Russia went horribly wrong, when a man playing Russian Roulette with a gun shot himself in the head. The tragedy was captured on videotape, which is now burning up the Internet.
According to a report in London’s Daily Mail, a man was making a toast, when he pulled out a gun, and asked for volunteers to play Russian Roulette.
As seen on the video, the man handed a gun to another man, who put it to his own head and pulled the trigger. He went down instantly.
It turned out to be a rubber bullet in the chamber. But shot at such close range, it proved to be just as harmful as a regular bullet. Russian media accounts say the man suffered brain damage and paralysis, describing his condition as “very poor.”
The toast-maker, identified by London’s Telegraph as a 33-year-old Chechian man, was arrested despite his claims that it was a prank gone wrong. He says he thought he had emptied the gun of bullets.
WARNING: The following video is graphic:

(We are pleased to post the following press release from the Violence Policy Center).
For Immediate Release: Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Contact: Ashley Liebre, Violence Policy Center, 202-822-8200 x110, press@vpc.org
Washington, DC–Concealed handgun permit holders have killed at least nine law enforcement officers in addition to 142 private citizens (including 15 shooters who killed themselves after an attack) since May 2007 according to the latest update of Concealed Carry Killers, a Violence Policy Center (VPC) on-line resource that tallies news reports of such killings.
The web site, located at http://www.vpc.org/ccwkillers.htm, is updated monthly to include new fatal shootings since May 2007 by concealed handgun permit holders and any changes in the legal status of permit holders facing criminal charges. (Any concealed handgun permit holders who are eventually acquitted of their alleged crimes are not included in the tallies maintained on the site although the facts surrounding the shooting are detailed.)
The VPC web site categorizes the 89 incidents, which occurred in 23 states, and offers detailed descriptions of each incident (some incidents may fit into multiple categories). Of these incidents, 15 were murder-suicides involving firearms and 13 were mass shootings (three or more victims) that claimed as many as 11 lives at a time. Law enforcement officers were killed in Alabama, Florida (two incidents), Idaho, Ohio, and Pennsylvania (two incidents). All of the law enforcement killings were committed with guns.
Private citizens were killed in Alabama, Arkansas, California (two incidents), Colorado, Florida (15 incidents), Idaho (two incidents), Kentucky, Massachusetts (two incidents), Michigan (nine incidents), Minnesota, New York, North Carolina (five incidents), Ohio (eight incidents), Oklahoma (two incidents), Oregon, Pennsylvania (seven incidents), Rhode Island, South Carolina (two incidents), Tennessee (seven incidents), Texas (three incidents), Utah (five incidents), Virginia (five incidents), and Washington. All but one of the killings were committed with guns.
Violence Policy Center Legislative Director Kristen Rand states, “Each month we are finding more and more killings by concealed handgun permit holders. Just as opponents of weak concealed carry laws warned, we now know that concealed handgun permit holders are killing people in road rage incidents, arguments over parking spaces, and domestic disputes. The incidents we document graphically demonstrate how the presence of a handgun escalates an argument to a homicide. How many more people must die at the hands of concealed carry killers before state legislators act to fix these laws?”
Because most state systems that allow the carrying of concealed handguns in public by private citizens release little data about crimes committed by permit holders, the VPC reviews and tallies concealed handgun permit holder killings primarily as reported by news outlets. It is likely that the actual number of fatal incidents involving concealed handgun permit holders is far higher.
***
For non-fatal concealed carry incidents follow the VPC on Twitter — http://twitter.com/VPCinfo — and visit the Violence Policy Center’s Concealed Carry Killers page on Facebook:
The Violence Policy Center (www.vpc.org) is a national educational organization working to stop gun death and injury.
–END–

According to a press release from Iowa Gov. Chet Culver on March 23rd:
DES MOINES – Governor Chet Culver today signed legislation that will help protect Iowa families by taking guns out of the hands of abusers. Senate File 2357 prohibits a person who has been convicted of a domestic abuse crime, or is subject to a permanent civil protective order, from possessing firearms or other offensive weapons.
“As Governor, I stand with victim advocates and the Legislature in believing that doing nothing to prevent domestic violence is simply not an option,” Governor Culver. “It is our duty to do whatever we can to keep Iowa families safe, and this common-sense legislation provides an important tool to do so. I am proud to sign this bill in the name of all who have suffered at the hands of domestic abusers, and in the memory of all who have sadly lost their lives.”
According to KIRO Radio on March 24th:
Stock prices and recycling are the big items on the agenda for Wednesday morning at the Starbucks shareholder’s meeting. But the people gathering outside want to talk about something else.
Anti-gun protesters will be handing-out leaflets to the nearly 4,000 shareholders walking in to the meeting. They want Starbucks to ban guns at all of their shops and get rid of the current open-carry policy.
“Guns aren’t allowed at the Starbucks at the annual meetings, guns aren’t allowed at Starbucks corporate headquarters, guns aren’t allowed to be carried by Starbucks employees. Allowing Starbucks customers to bring guns in is dangerous and should be stopped,” said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, which is co-sponsoring the protest along with Ceasefire Washington.
Click here to sign the Brady Campaign’s petition to tell Starbucks to keep ALL loaded guns out of its stores.
According to the Associated Press on March 23:
DENVER (AP) — The Colorado Court of Appeals will hear arguments in a lawsuit by a gun rights organization challenging the University of Colorado’s ban on guns on campus.
The Students for Concealed Carry on Campus will appear Tuesday to argue that a 1994 CU policy banning concealed weapons from its campus violates state gun laws.
El Paso County District Judge G. David Miller threw the case out of court in May 2009. A decision from the Court of Appeals is expected within six weeks.
Miller said in his ruling he found nothing in the state constitution that would prohibit a campus gun ban. Many college campuses nationwide ban concealed weapons, but gun-rights advocates say gun-free campuses make students vulnerable to attack.
According to the Huffington Post on March 23rd:
A man who was arrested last week after attempting to bring knives into the Daley Center faces further charges after the Cook County sheriff’s officers and agents from the U.S. Marshal’s office found 1,600 knives and five guns in his Northwest Side home.
Kevin J. Long, 48, of the 4500 block of North Milwaukee Avenue, allegedly attempted to bring four knives into the Daley Center on March 16, according to the Chicago Tribune.
Long is on a judicial threat watch list, and is a convicted felon who has been arrested 18 times since 2000, according to a release from the Cook County Sheriff’s office.
Long was previously convicted of intimidating a witness in a civil court case, and his arrest last week violated the conditions of his parole.
Aside from the massive weapons collection, Steve Patterson, a spokesman for Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, said officers found pieces of paper with “police officer and sheriff deputy names on them,” the Tribune reports.
“There was nothing saying a specific threat against a specific person but it was certainly clear that he was documenting specific people’s names,” Patterson told the paper.
When he was caught with the knives last week, he told sheriff’s deputies he was at a downtown sporting goods store that day and bought the weapons as gifts, the Chicago Sun-Times reports. He said he forgot the knives were still in his briefcase, and a receipt in his bag showed “he had spent $142.18 on the knives that day.”
According to TPMMuckraker on March 23rd:
The latest legal headache for the company formerly known as Blackwater doesn’t center on dead civilians in Afghanistan or alleged bribes in Iraq, but instead on a couple dozen automatic weapons the company may have illegally held at its Moyock, North Carolina, headquarters.
The AP is reporting that “senior Justice Department officials” are looking at a draft indictment against former Blackwater president Gary Jackson and two other ex-officials following a 2008 raid in which the Feds seized 17 AK-47s from the company’s headquarters.
The case seems to revolve around whether the company, now known as Xe, illegally obtained automatic weapons by claiming it was providing storage for the local sheriff:
Multiple law enforcement officials familiar with the case said investigators are trying to determine if Blackwater obtained the official letterhead of a local sheriff to create a false justification for buying the guns. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the investigation.
Read the whole thing.
See Garry Trudeau’s brilliant comic strip in the Washington Post on March 22nd.
Click here to sign the Brady Campaign’s petition to tell Starbucks to keep ALL loaded guns out of its stores.
According to the Chicago Sun-Times Media Wire on March 19th:
Fifteen people were shot — including one man who died — all over the city Thursday night in just under six hours.
At 5:30 p.m. a 16-year-old boy was shot in the arm on the North Side in the 5000 block of North Kenmore Avenue, according to police News Affairs Officer Veejay Zala.
The boy did not suffer life threatening injuries and was taken to Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Zala said.
At 6:37 p.m. a 19-year-old man playing basketball in Cole Park, 8500 S. King Dr., was shot after trying to break up a fight. He was taken to Jackson Park Hospital in good condition, police said.
A 21-year-old man was shot in the mid-section at 6:48 p.m. in the 4500 block of West Altgeld Street, according to Zala.
At 7:15 p.m. four men were shot in the 7700 block of South Loomis Boulevard, according to Zala.
Fire Media Affairs Director Larry Langford said one 31-year-old man was taken in critical condition to John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, one 19-year-old was taken to Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood in an unidentified condition and a 24-year-old suffered a graze wound and was taken to Stroger.
A fourth man was taken to Advocate Christ Medical Center in Oak Lawn with a gunshot wound to the leg, Langford said.
At 7:20 p.m. two men were wounded in the 3200 block of West Crystal Street during a shooting, according to police. One suffered a gunshot wound to the head and the other suffered a gunshot wound to the knee and both were taken to Stroger, police said.
In the West Side’s Austin neighborhood at 8:40 p.m., a man in his 20s was shot and killed in the 5300 block of West Chicago Avenue, according to police News Affairs Officer Hector Alfaro.
A spokesman for the Cook County Medical Examiner’s Office said the unidentified man who was shot at 5355 W. Chicago Ave. was pronounced dead at 9:20 p.m. at Mount Sinai Hospital.
At 9:45 p.m. a 23-year-old man was shot at 5945 S. Rockwell Ave., police said. He was taken to Holy Cross Hospital in good condition, police said.
At 10:50 p.m. — only about a half of a mile from where the Chicago Avenue murder occurred — two men, a boy and a female were wounded in another shooting.
Alfaro said police responded to the shooting in the 5400 block of West Iowa Street and found three males and a female wounded.
Langford said a 14-year-old and a 18-year-old — both males — who were both shot were taken in critical condition to Mount Sinai Hospital.
A 21-year-old man was also taken in critical condition to Loretto Hospital from the shooting while a fourth person was taken in good to fair condition to West Suburban Medical Center in Oak Park, Langford said.
Belmont, Grand Central, Calumet and Wentworth Area detectives are investigating all shootings.
The Washington Post editorialized on March 20th that President Obama must make gun violence prevention a much higher priority.
President Obama simply must lead the fight to the close the “gun show loophole” which allows anyone — including felons, domestic abusers, gang members, drug dealers, and would be terrorists — to purchase firearms and assault weapons without undergoing a criminal background check or showing an ID. Such gaping loopholes in our nation’s patchwork gun laws are a major threat to the safety of the American people and our national security.
APPARENTLY, one of the weapons John Patrick Bedell used to shoot two Pentagon police officers this month was sold to a Georgia gun dealer by the Memphis Police Department, which had confiscated the weapon during a drug bust. The gun was sold several times more, including at a gun show in Nevada last year. Little is known about that gun-show purchaser because of giant loopholes in the law that allow unlicensed private vendors, or “hobbyists,” to dispense with federally mandated background checks. A couple of lessons can be drawn.
First, it is absurd for police departments to put guns back into circulation. The possibility of making a little bit of money from the sale of illegal weapons or swapping them for guns more suitable for law enforcement is not worth the cost in lives and safety. Police departments should put a halt to this practice; legally confiscated guns should be destroyed after they are no longer needed as evidence — a measure endorsed by the International Association of Chiefs of Police.
Second, there are steps the Obama administration could take immediately to reduce the danger to law enforcement officers and other law-abiding citizens. Legislation is needed to close the gun-show loophole to require background checks for all purchasers.
But the 500-strong, bipartisan coalition Mayors Against Illegal Guns has outlined 40 steps that the Obama administration could take on its own to get illegal guns off the streets. The FBI should alert local officials when a would-be purchaser has failed a background check; such an alert would put local law enforcement officials on notice that a “prohibited purchaser” with a disqualifying criminal history or an outstanding domestic violence warrant is trying to obtain a weapon.
The mayors’ group sensibly urges the Justice Department to step up prosecutions of the most dangerous “prohibited purchasers,” including convicted murders and rapists who by law are barred from owning weapons. The administration should also heed the mayors’ call to crack down on illegal gun-show sales to criminals and straw purchasers.
Northern Illinois University finally released its in-depth report (300 pages) and psychological profile of Steven Kazmierczak, who on Valentine’s Day in 2008 went on a shooting rampage at Cole Hall where he used a shotgun and two handguns to kill 5 students and injure 21 others before killing himself. The attack lasted 7 minutes. The Chicago Tribune’s article based on NIU’s report is worth reading.
The report offers the most detailed account to date of Kazmierczak’s troubled life, including repeated suicide attempts that required hospitalization, unresolved conflicts with his parents stemming from their decision to institutionalize him and interest in satanic rituals.
It also summarizes lessons the university learned in responding to the crisis, and includes transcripts of the first hour of police radio traffic beginning at 3:06 p.m. with a 911 call. There were a dizzying 200 communications in the first hour, including this one at 3:11 p.m.: “Shooter’s down. Shotgun’s secure. We need an ambulance and the coroner at Cole Hall.”
Killed were sophomore Gayle Dubowski, an anthropology major involved with her church; sophomore Catalina Garcia, active with the campus’ Latino Resource Center; junior Julianna Gehant, who had served in the Army; sophomore Ryanne Mace, an honors student who planned to work in counseling; and sophomore Daniel Parmenter, who tried to shield his girlfriend.
The 27-page profile of Kazmierczak, written by an independent psychologist hired by NIU for about $10,000, states that the shooter had been diagnosed as a teenager with schizoaffective disorder, a disabling mental illness characterized by a combination of schizophrenia and a mood disorder such as manic-depression.
The profile suggests he increased the difficulty of his shooting spree as if it were one of his beloved video games.
When he had emptied the shotgun and walked down into the audience with his handguns, he fired at only those who ran or ducked. Those who sat frozen in their seats, the easiest targets, were ignored.
Kazmierczak, 27, made it difficult for investigators to identify a motive. He didn’t leave a suicide note. The hard drive of his computer has never been found. He tossed out his cell phone’s memory card.
Is the gun lobby going to wage a political war now with the United States Air Force, claiming the service is denying soldiers and airmen their “Second Amendment rights”? And since the NRA routinely says that registering firearms is the first step to confiscating all guns, is the gun lobby accusing the Air Force of “disarming” itself? (Kind of a funny image actually).
It’s quite a rhetorical trap the gun lobby has put itself in, don’t you think?
According to a statement by Carl Bergquist, Air University Public Affairs on March 15th:
MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. — Registering a firearm with the appropriate authorities on Maxwell-Gunter is required in order to bring a firearm on base.
Master Sgt. James Kanz, NCO in charge of the 42nd Security Forces Squadron Armory, wants to remind all Maxwell-Gunter members and residents that firearm registration is mandatory for all individuals living on Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base.
“Individuals living in privatized housing are required to register weapons with security forces at the Maxwell Visitor’s Center at Building 518 on Maxwell,” he said. “Individuals living in single airman quarters are required to register and store their firearms in the 42nd SFS Armory at Building 943 on Maxwell.”
The sergeant said individuals living in temporary quarters, lodging, or the dormitories must register and store privately owned weapons in the armory as well.
There, members will be given an Air Force Form 1314, which must be signed by their commander within 72 hours. Once the AF Form 1314 has been signed, they will need to get a copy of their Department of Defense Form 2760, which is a qualification to possess firearms or ammunition out of their personnel records. Both of these forms will then need to be returned to the 42nd SFS Armory.
“If residing in base housing, Airmen should start by having their commander sign an AF Form 1314 with all their weapons listed. They will also need to get a copy of their DD Form 2760 to take to the visitor’s center,” Sergeant Kanz said. “The Maxwell Visitor’s Center will use the information provided on the AF Form 1314 to register the weapons in the Security Forces Management Information System database.”
He said concealed weapons permits issued by civil authorities are not valid on Maxwell-Gunter without the expressed written approval of the 42nd Air Base Wing Commander.
Individuals may only transport privately-owned weapons on Maxwell-Gunter when driving directly to and from the armory for storage or their residence in base family housing.
Individuals must notify the entry controller that they have a privately owned weapon in their vehicle when they arrive at a gate and where they intend to transport it. Privately owned weapons must be unloaded and with the ammunition separate from the weapon.
“Individuals may check out their weapon temporarily, but the weapon must be returned within 72 hours, unless they are going on leave, temporary duty or have written permission from their first sergeant or commander,” Sergeant Kanz said.
According to the Associated Press on March 15th:
WASHINGTON – Two guns used in high-profile shootings this year at the Pentagon and a Las Vegas courthouse both came from the same unlikely place: the police and court system of Memphis, Tenn.
Law enforcement officials told The Associated Press that both guns were once seized in criminal cases in Memphis. The officials described how the weapons made their separate ways from an evidence vault to gun dealers and to the shooters.
The use of guns that once were in police custody and were later involved in attacks on police officers highlights a little-known divide in gun policy in the United States: Many cities and states destroy guns gathered in criminal probes, but others sell or trade the weapons in order to get other guns or buy equipment such as bulletproof vests.
In fact, on the day of the Pentagon shooting, March 4, the Tennessee governor signed legislation revising state law on confiscated guns.
Before, law enforcement agencies in the state had the option of destroying a gun. Under the new version, agencies can only destroy a gun if it’s inoperable or unsafe.
Kentucky has a similar law, but it’s not clear how many other states have laws specifically designed to promote the police sale or trade of confiscated weapons.
A nationwide review by The Associated Press in December found that over the previous two years, 24 states — mostly in the South and West, where gun-rights advocates are particularly strong — have passed 47 new laws loosening gun restrictions. Gun rights groups are making a greater effort to pass favorable legislation in state capitals.
John Timoney, who led the Philadelphia and Miami police departments and served as New York’s No. 2 police official, said he doesn’t believe police departments should be putting more guns into the market.
“I just think it’s unseemly for police departments to be selling guns that later turn up,” he said, recalling that he had once been offered the chance to sell guns to raise money for the police budget. “Obviously, we always need the money but I just said, `No, we will take the loss and get rid of the guns’,” said the former police chief, who now works for Andrews International, a security consulting firm.
A spokeswoman for the Memphis police said gun swaps are a way to save taxpayer money.
One of the weapons in the Pentagon attack was seized by Memphis police in 2005 and later traded to a gun dealer; the gun used in the Jan. 4 courthouse shooting in Las Vegas as sold by a judge’s order and the proceeds given to the Memphis-area sheriff’s office. Neither weapon was sold by the Memphis law enforcement agencies directly to the men who later used them to shoot officers.
In both cases, the weapons first went to licensed gun dealers, but later came into the hands of men who were legally barred from possessing them: one a convicted felon; the other mentally ill.
The history of the two guns in the recent attacks was described by officials from multiple law enforcement agencies on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss details of the investigations. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives provided reports on the gun traces to the investigating agencies, but is barred from publicly disclosing the results.
At the Pentagon, gunman John Patrick Bedell carried two 9 mm handguns, one of them a Ruger.
Law enforcement officials say Bedell, a man with a history of severe psychiatric problems, had been sent a letter by California authorities Jan. 10 telling him he was prohibited from buying a gun because of his mental history.
Nineteen days later, the officials say, Bedell bought the Ruger at a gun show in Las Vegas. Such a sale by a private individual does not require the kind of background check that would have stopped Bedell’s purchase.
Mike Campbell, an ATF spokesman in Washington, would not confirm the details. He would only say Bedell “appears to have purchased the gun from a private seller.”
The gun already had changed hands among gun dealers in Georgia and Pennsylvania by the time Bedell bought it. Officer Karen Rudolph, a Memphis police spokeswoman, said her department traded the weapon to a dealer in 2008 for a different gun that was better for police work.
The Ruger had sat in Memphis police storage for years at that point, after being confiscated from a convicted felon at a 2005 traffic stop.
The trail of the gun used at the Las Vegas federal courthouse is older and harder to pin down. Johnny Lee Wicks, an elderly man enraged over cuts to his Social Security benefits, opened fire with the shotgun at the security entrance to the courthouse. He killed one officer, Stanley Cooper, and wounded another.
Wicks, like Bedell at the Pentagon, was killed by officers’ return fire.
Before that courthouse attack, what records exist suggest officers in Memphis confiscated that gun in 1998.
A judge in Memphis ordered the sale of the shotgun as part of a criminal case, and the proceeds of that sale went to the Shelby County Sheriff’s Office, confirmed sheriff’s spokesman Steve Shular.
He said the gun dealer who bought it later sold the weapon to a dealer in Nevada. It is not clear how Wicks got the shotgun.
Rich Wyatt, a former police chief in Alma, Colo., who now operates a gun store — and who has bought weapons from police agencies — defended the practice of police selling guns.“Maybe if they put the money they made selling the guns into training those officers better, they’d be better off,” said Wyatt. “Nobody ever, ever questions selling a car that was used in a crime. I am sad that officers were shot, but I don’t care where the guns came from.
To say we need to chase guns is not the issue, we need to chase people.”
(We are pleased to post the following press release from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence).
BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
For Immediate Release: Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Contact: Peter Hamm, 202-289-5792
Washington, D.C. – The Starbucks Coffee Company allows customers to carry guns, yet prohibits employees from having weapons in Starbucks stores.
“These two policies seem to be in conflict,†said Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “If employees having guns is dangerous, why isn’t it equally dangerous for customers to have guns?â€
Starbucks’ Standards of Business Conduct manual, posted on the company’s website, reads “Partners [employees] may not have or possess any weapon while in a Starbucks store, plant or on other Starbucks property.”
The manual is here: http://assets.starbucks.com/assets/sobc-fy09-eng.pdf
The Brady Campaign launched an online petition earlier this year (at www.bradycampaign.org), asking people to send a message to Starbucks to bar firearms in its stores. More than 33,000 have signed the petition. “We continue to urge Starbucks to join other companies in establishing a no gun policy,†Helmke said.
“Starbucks has defended its policy allowing customers to have guns by arguing that it is merely complying with the law. But, of course, prohibiting employees from having guns is also complying with the law,†Helmke said. “The law allows Starbucks to determine its own gun policies. It has made the right choice on guns for employees and the wrong choice on guns for customers.â€
The company hosts its annual meeting for shareholders next Wednesday in Seattle.
As the nation’s largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence, the Brady Campaign, with its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, works to enact and enforce sensible gun laws, regulations and public policies. The Brady Campaign is devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school,
at work, and in our communities.
Visit the Brady Campaign website at www.bradycampaign.org.
For continuing insight and comment on the gun issue, read Paul Helmke’s blog at www.bradycampaign.org/blog/.
###
According to the Associated Press on March 14th:
CIUDAD JUAREZ, Mexico — Gunmen killed a U.S. consulate employee and her husband as they drove in this violent border city with their baby in the back seat, minutes after the husband of another consular employee was shot to death and his two children wounded, officials said Sunday.
Security forces suspected a drug gang hit, but offered no motive.
President Barack Obama expressed outrage over the killings, and Mexican President Felipe Calderon said he was indignant and promised a swift investigation.The gunmen are suspected of belonging to a gang of hit men tied to the Juarez drug cartel, according to a statement from the joint mission of soldiers and federal police overseeing security in Ciudad Juarez. The statement said the theory was based on “information exchanged with U.S. federal agencies” helping in the investigation.
But police gave no information on a possible motive. U.S. State Department spokesman Fred Lash said the three slain people had attended the same social event before the attacks Saturday.
Several U.S. citizens have been killed in Mexico’s drug war, most of them people with family ties to Mexico. It is very rare for American government employees to be targeted, although assailants hurled grenades at the U.S. consulate in the northern city of Monterrey in 2008.
Civilians have increasingly gotten caught in the middle of drug gang violence that has made Ciudad Juarez one of the deadliest cities in the world, with more than 2,500 people killed last year alone. At least 11 people were killed in Ciudad Juarez over the weekend.
The three died during a particularly bloody weekend in Mexico, with nearly 50 people killed in apparent gang violence. Nine people were killed in a gang shootout early Sunday in the Pacific resort city of Acapulco, one of Mexico’s spring break attractions.
The State Department authorized U.S. government employees at Ciudad Juarez and five other U.S. consulates in northern Mexico to send their family members out of the area because of concerns about rising drug violence. The cities are Tijuana, Nogales, Nuevo Laredo, Monterrey and Matamoros.
Lash said the decision was based not only on Saturday’s killings but also on a wider pattern of violence and threats in northern Mexico in recent weeks. The State Department noted the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City has advised American citizens to delay unnecessary travel to parts of the Mexican states of Durango, Coahuila and Chihuahua.

(We are pleased to post the following guest commentary from Josh Sugarmann, Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center. Mr. Sugarmann’s essay was originally posted on the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence’s “Insights” section on its website).
March 10, 2010
Since its inception, the Violence Policy Center (VPC) has approached gun violence as a broad-based public health, as opposed to solely a crime issue.
The public health approach offers insight into the full range of gun death and injury. At the same time, drawing from a long history of lessons learned from life-saving consumer product regulation, the VPC believes that the most effective approach to reducing firearm injury and mortality lies in looking beyond the gun store counter to the industry itself — and holding gun makers and their products to the same health and safety standards that all other consumer products must meet.
With the recent regulation of tobacco, guns are now the only consumer product sold in the United States not regulated by a federal agency for health and safety.
This approach is summed up in our 1994 study Cease Fire: A Comprehensive Strategy to Reduce Firearms Violence.
Prior to the release of Cease Fire, gun violence prevention efforts focused almost solely on the user — not on the industry itself. Since Cease Fire’s release more than 15 years ago, the industry has continued to exploit its unique, unregulated status by designing and marketing increasingly lethal weapons as measured by firepower and capacity. Today’s gun industry is, in fact, primarily a purveyor of military-bred technology.
Trend Toward More Lethal Weapons
As my VPC colleague Tom Diaz states in his 1999 book Making a Killing: The Business of Guns in America, “Lethality is the nicotine of the gun industry.†It’s what the industry uses to hook new buyers and keep past customers. The trend is long and all-too-easily documented, beginning in the 1980s when six-shot revolvers were replaced by high-capacity pistols.

This was followed by: assault weapons; powerful palm-sized pistols labeled “pocket rockets†by the industry; “vest-busting†handguns like the 50 caliber Smith & Wesson Model 500, capable of penetrating the most common level of body armor worn by law enforcement; and, 50 caliber sniper rifles capable of penetrating armor plating and downing jetliners on take-off and landing at distances of up to a mile. The common thread connecting each of these technological “advances�
Increased lethality, eagerly marketed by the gun industry with no concern for public safety.
This constant innovation for lethality is a waning industry’s response to the steady decline in household gun ownership.
From 1972 to 2006, the percentage of American households that reported having any guns in the home dropped nearly 20 percentage points: from a high of 54 percent in 1977 to 34.5 percent in 2006.
During the period 1980 to 2006, the percentage of Americans who reported personally owning a gun dropped more than nine percentage points: from a high of 30.7 percent in 1985 to a low of 21.6 percent in 2006.
The reason is that the primary firearms market of white males is aging and dying off — and they aren’t being replaced by a new generation of shooters. This has resulted in a two-pronged approach by the industry. The first is trying to resell the white male market of current gun owners.
This has resulted in the marketing of militarization (assault weapons, etc.) and specialization (e.g., pistols marketed for concealed carry — a “movement†that at its core is about selling guns). A key marketing aspect of this effort has been to advertise these weapons as the civilian versions of the guns used by our military and homeland security forces.
The second, following a trail blazed by the tobacco industry, is to entice and engage women and children — an effort that, beyond anecdotes, has met with extremely limited success.
The Modern-Day “Citizen Soldierâ€
Today, when we look at the gun culture we see that there are two types of gun owners. For the majority, guns are a part of their life. But for a small, yet active and aggressive minority, guns are their life. The gun lobby has become expert at using this second group to further its goals.
Common themes that dominate this group are a distrust of government and law enforcement, an image of themselves as modern-day “citizen soldiers†who are the physical manifestation of what they view as America’s core values, and a belief that the only thing that stands between democracy and totalitarianism is civilian gun ownership.

And while the vast majority of these self-described patriots will never act on their Walter Mitty-esque rhetoric, some do—with devastating results. Last year in Pittsburgh, CCW (Concealed Carry Weapons) holder Richard Poplawski, armed with an AK-47 assault rifle, shot and killed three police officers in an ambush at the home he shared with his mother. Poplawski had voiced to his friends fears that the Obama administration wanted to ban guns.
Recognizing the potential power for activism this distinct pool of gun owners represents, the NRA and other members of the gun lobby have become expert at exploiting their fears for their own political and financial gain.
The NRA’s theme of ‘Obama’s coming for your guns’ is merely a rehash of its “jack-booted government thugs†attacks on federal law enforcement that occurred during the Clinton Administration—a period during which the NRA actively explored the grassroots potential of the militia movement.
The inherent risk in the NRA catering to this paranoid mindset is that the organization can play a lethal, validating role.
During the Clinton Administration, the NRA warned that the “final war has begun.†Former NRA member Timothy McVeigh took the organization at its word, resulting in the deadly 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
Working Together
Right now the national gun violence prevention movement is working together as closely as it has ever worked – exchanging information, developing strategies, and collaborating on the local, state, and national levels. Yet longstanding problems remain.
We face an engaged, well-funded opponent while lacking the financial resources to help give voice to those who want to aid us in our efforts. While a few key foundations have taken a longstanding, leadership role on this issue, a challenge that remains is how do we help other foundations better understand the debilitating effect gun violence has on their own policy efforts in areas such as domestic violence prevention, early childhood education, youth violence prevention, and numerous others
The ability to work together is more important then ever. The election of President Obama has been cynically exploited by the gun lobby and the firearms industry to increase short-term gun sales in America—with no concern for the potential long-term consequences.
At the same time, the President’s election has resulted in a reawakening of the extreme right in America. And all of this is occurring against a backdrop of increasingly lethal, easily available, weaponry.
For those of us who work to stop gun death and injury the question is how do we get the American public to look beyond the national headlines that inevitably appear in the wake of the most recent horrible incident and understand the direct effect gun violence has on their daily lives — from the fear of a stranger on a darkened city street to the loss of a loved one in a suburban home.
In the short term, we must hold the President to the promises he made before his election — such as banning assault weapons (right now, President Obama can use his executive powers to ban the import of foreign-made assault weapons) and ending restrictions on the public release of national crime gun trace data that was previously available through the Freedom of Information Act (the Tiahrt Amendment).
In the long term, as a public interest movement, it’s our responsibility to make sure that the public understands the true nature of firearms violence, that those most affected by it are given voice, and that we advocate for measures that are effective.
One of the gun lobby’s greatest successes has been in framing gun violence solely as a crime issue—i.e. “bad†people get guns and hurt us, the “good†people — with the all-too-frequent acquiescence of advocates on our own side.
Yet, it’s the “good†people who are doing most of the killing. The majority of the more than 30,000 gun deaths that occur each year are suicides—nearly 17,000 in 2006—acts of despair that result in death as the result of the unique lethality of firearms. The most common homicide scenario is not attack by a stranger, but an argument between people who know one another. And fatal gun accidents speak for themselves.
Our responsibility as a gun violence prevention movement is not to offer the most easily accepted answers, but the most effective solutions.
As a public interest movement, we have a trust and responsibility to give voice to the victims of gun violence and educate the public and policymakers about the realities of firearms death and injury.
While we, of course, have to operate within the confines of political reality, this unique responsibility requires that we offer solutions that will work, not just slogans that will sell.
Josh Sugarmann is executive director of the Violence Policy Center, a national educational foundation based in Washington, D.C. working to reduce gun death and injury. He is the author of the books NRA: Money, Firepower & Fear (1994, scheduled to be reprinted Spring 2010) and Every Handgun is Aimed at You: The Case for Banning Handguns (2001).
Visit the VPC’s web site at www.vpc.org or visit the VPC’s pages on Facebook.
(We are pleased to post the following press release from the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence).
For Immediate Release
Contact: Thom Mannard (312) 341-0939, cell (847) 997-3020, tmannard@ichv.org
ISRA Uses Lobby Day to Press For Dangerous Carrying Concealed Weapons Law That Threatens Public Safety
(March 10, 2010, Chicago) – The Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence (ICHV) said that the Illinois Gun Owner’s Lobby Day (IGOLD) held in Springfield today should answer for the fact that concealed handgun permit holders have committed scores of homicides, including shooting law enforcement officers, rampage shootings and murder-suicides.
Despite the rhetoric and spin from the ISRA and the gun lobby that CCW handgun permit holders are “law abiding,†mounting evidence and scores of violent incidents show that concealed handgun permit holders are a risk to public safety.
For example, on January 19, 2010 in Virginia, Christopher Speight, a CCW permit holder, shot and killed eight people including his sister and her husband, their 15-year-old daughter and four-year-old son, as well as two teenagers aged 15 and 16. Speight was described by co-workers as a handyman, construction worker, and security guard who had a longtime fascination with guns and a fear of government conspiracies. Speight enjoyed target shooting at a range on his property.
According to neighbors, prior to the shooting Speight began shooting daily on his range, including high-powered rifles. Speight, troubled about a perceived family dispute over a house and land, owned as many as 40 guns and was said to be very skilled with weapons. The gun lobby likes to dismiss cases such as Speight’s for fear that such violent shootings undermine the gun lobby’s radical agenda.
Speight’s mass killing was one of many fatal shootings cataloged in an on-line resource, “CCW Killers,†from the Violence Policy Center that monitors homicides committed by concealed handgun permit holders since May 2007. The appalling numbers speak for themselves: 139 people have been killed, 9 of which were law enforcement officers. In addition, the VCP found 13 mass shootings committed by CCW handgun permit holders and 14 murder-suicides.
See the VPC study here: http://www.vpc.org/ccwkillers.htm
“I think the ISRA should explain to the public why carrying hidden and loaded handguns in public is a good idea when we have a mountain of evidence that too many CCW permit holders in other states are unstable and violent, resulting in an appalling number of homicides,†said Thom Mannard, Executive Director of the ICHV. “This evidence points to one conclusion, that a concealed weapons law is dangerous and a major threat for Illinois residents.â€
Violence Policy Center Legislative Director Kristen Rand states, “When the National Rifle Association launched its state-by-state campaign for lax concealed handgun laws, it made this promise: ‘People who get permits in states which have fair right-to-carry laws are law-abiding, upstanding community leaders who merely seek to exercise their right to self-defense.’ To the contrary, concealed handgun permit holders are killing people over parking spaces, football games, and family arguments.â€
Because most state systems that allow the carrying of concealed handguns in public by private citizens release little data about crimes committed by permit holders, the VPC reviews and tallies concealed handgun permit holder killings primarily as reported by news outlets. It is likely that the actual number of fatal incidents involving concealed handgun permit holders is far higher.
–END–
Meet Wayne
This video was produced by the Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort.
TAKE ACTION: Click here to sign a postcard to demand that criminal backgrounds are conducted on all gun purchases.
The Philadelphia Inquirer published an editorial on March 4th about the Supreme Court’s new Second Amendment case, McDonald v. City of Chicago, about the city’s handgun ban.
A gun-rights decision by the Supreme Court two years ago threatened to make it more dangerous to walk the streets of Washington.
Now the top court’s conservative voting bloc seems intent upon expanding the risk to other U.S. cities by dismantling strong gun-violence safeguards.
Chicago’s long-standing handgun ban came into the crosshairs of the National Rifle Association this week, as the group sought to extend the reach of the court’s earlier ruling that the Second Amendment protects individual gun rights.
During arguments in the case on Tuesday, most of the justices who struck down the District of Columbia’s 1976 handgun ban gave pretty clear signals that they believe the ruling could be applied to strike down other strict gun-control measures.
While the June 2008 ruling sent District of Columbia officials back to rewrite their gun rules, the court left some hope for big-city mayors battling gun violence by restricting the ruling to the district. More importantly, the court opined that “the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.”
Gun-control advocates rightly took the decision to mean that the Constitution does allow the enactment of reasonable limits on guns to safeguard citizens.
It was only a matter of time, though, before the NRA would seek to wield the ruling as a club against local gun-safety rules. The question now is how far the high court will let the NRA go in undoing the sensible gun-safety rules with which many communities have long been comfortable.
There is no good reason for the court to go that route, other than to press the NRA’s agenda. As Bryan Miller, head of the New Jersey anti-gun-violence group Ceasefire NJ, noted: “Chicago’s handgun ban has been in effect for 28 years. Yet suddenly the gun lobby has manufactured a court case with the intention of totally dismantling our nation’s gun laws so gun makers can sell more guns.”
If the court extends its Second Amendment ruling to jurisdictions beyond D.C., it will have embarked on a dangerous redefinition of the nation’s gun laws.
At the very least, gun laws that may be struck down in Chicago and elsewhere will take time to be rewritten to pass standards of reasonableness that the Supreme Court itself hasn’t even outlined.
That will lead to a greater proliferation of handguns – with the inevitable increase in illegal gun trafficking.
Assuming that the court is willing to overturn century-old legal precedent to apply its ruling outside the nation’s capital, it will be embarking on a social and legal experiment that’s likely to play out across the chalk outlines on many cities’ mean streets.
Given the national plague of gun violence, that’s simply the wrong course for the court.
According to TPMMuckaker on March 3rd:
A Louisiana sheriff plans to arm volunteers with shotguns, riot shields, batons, and a .50-caliber machine gun mounted on a “war wagon,” as part of “Operation Exodus,” a program to provide security in the event of a terrorist attack or civic unrest.
“It’s a calling,” he says.
The office of Sheriff Larry Deen of Bossier Parish, near Shreveport in the northwest part of the state, last month selected for the program 200 local residents — mostly ex-law-enforcement personnel — and began training them in “defensive techniques in the event of a struggle,” reports the Shreveport Times.
The plan calls for the new recruits to be sent to protect food from grocery stores, gas from gas stations, and other crucial local resources, should the situation demand it.
According to the Palm Beach Post updated on March 1st:
A gun instructor accidently shot a student in the foot Saturday during an NRA class to receive certification to carry a concealed weapon, Orlando police said.
Robert Frauman Jr., 50, was taken to Florida Hospital after instructor Michael Phillips’ firearm discharged about 11:45 a.m., police said.
Phillips, 32, could not be reached for comment. The accident happened at Summit Church, located in a former movie theater near the Fashion Square mall.
The bullet went through a table before it hit Frauman, said Kristy-Lee Lawley, the church’s communications director. She said Frauman, a member of the church, was “recovering well” and the bullet didn’t break any bones.
Frauman was one of three students in the class, which was not a church-sponsored event, Lawley said. She said the church offered an upstairs conference room for free after some church members requested to have the class there. Lawley said the church is empty on Saturdays and this was the first class of its kind there.
“We won’t be having anything like that in our church in the future,” Lawley said.
According to the Indiana Daily Student paper on March 1st:
A 21-year-old IU student was arrested after he used a loaded handgun to assault a man at Kilroy’s Sports Bar early Saturday morning.
Bloomington police Sgt. Jim Batcho said officers arrived at the bar around 2:45 a.m. Saturday and walked down an alley where they found Alexander Edward Brill with his hands in the air, surrounded by bar employees.
Brill told officers he had a loaded Smith & Wesson .45-caliber automatic handgun.
An officer confiscated it, along with a magazine of bullets in Brill’s front left pocket and a knife in his front right pocket.
Sgt. Scott Oldham, who responded to the call, said the gun was fully loaded with a bullet in the chamber.
Batcho said Brill had an Indiana personal protection gun permit, which he was holding in his hand when officers arrived.
The majority of states have certain carry laws, which enable citizens to have a firearm in public as long as the individual has a valid permit and is not intoxicated, Oldham said.
Batcho said Brill is facing preliminary charges of battery while armed and intimidation with a deadly weapon, both Class C felonies, and pointing a firearm, a Class D felony.
Brill was at the bar when he starting talking to a woman he knew, Batcho read from the report. Brill told officers that five men approached him, verbally taunting and harassing him.
According to written witness statements gathered by the police, Brill pointed the gun at a female bar employee. When a man tried to intervene and diffuse the situation, Brill hit him with the weapon.
Brill told officers he was afraid and pulled the gun for protection. He said he had been injured in fights in Bloomington before.
— Vince Zito contributed reporting to this story.
See link to the Supreme Court’s transcripts of the oral arguments here.

Oral Arguments to Supreme Court On Chicago’s Handgun Ban
The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed poised to require state and local governments to obey the Second Amendment guarantee of a personal right to a gun, but with perhaps considerable authority to regulate that right. The dominant sentiment on the Court was to extend the Amendment beyond the federal level, based on the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of “due process,†since doing so through another part of the 14th Amendment would raise too many questions about what other rights might emerge.
When the Justices cast their first vote after starting later this week to discuss where to go from here, it appeared that the focus of debate will be how extensive a “right to keep and bear arms†should be spelled out: would it be only some “core right†to have a gun for personal safety, or would it include every variation of that right that could emerge in the future as courts decide specific cases?
The liberal wing of the Court appeared to be making a determined effort to hold the expanded Amendment in check, but even the conservatives open to applying the Second Amendment to states, counties and cities seemed ready to concede some — but perhaps fewer — limitations.
Resources On Chicago’s Handgun Ban
News & Opinion On Chicago’s Handgun Ban
(We strongly urge you to read Josh Sugarmann’s new piece on the Huffington Post published on March 1st. Sugarmann is the Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center in Washington, DC.)
Tomorrow “Sport Shooting Ambassador Award” winner Antonin Scalia will hear oral arguments in McDonald v. Chicago, a case that will decide whether the opinion penned by the gun industry “Ambassador” in District of Columbia v. Heller will be applied across the nation.
Tuesday’s oral arguments will be a homecoming of sorts for Scalia and Alan Gottlieb, whose Second Amendment Foundation is one of the driving forces behind the McDonald case (Gottlieb himself is an object lesson in the gun lobby’s immunity to irony.
The SAF head is a convicted felon–he was caught cheating on his taxes–who at one time lost the ability to possess guns. He later regained the ability to own guns through the now-defunct federal “relief from disability” program, a multi-million dollar program that re-armed convicted, often violent, felons, at taxpayer expense. The program was defunded after being exposed by my organization, the Violence Policy Center.)
When last seen together (at least by me), the two graced the cover of The New Gun Week in an article celebrating the ambassadorship bestowed on Scalia by the World Forum on the Future of Sport Shooting Activities (WFSA), an international organization comprised primarily of gunmakers and pro-gun organizations (including the National Rifle Association and the Second Amendment Foundation) from around the world.
The award given to Scalia by the WFSA’s “Image Sub-Committee” offers “public recognition of the social contribution made by some of the many public figures who have a longstanding interest in the shooting sports.” Scalia was awarded the honor and gave the keynote address during the WFSA’s 2007 annual meeting in Nuremberg, Germany.
The previous year’s winner was Ugo Gussalli Beretta, president of the Italian gun manufacturer Beretta. The award consists of a silver reproduction of a 16th century pistol with powder flask. .
While the WFSA Web site has photos and comments from prior “WFSA Ambassadors,” Scalia can’t be found–and a photo appears to be overlayed where his own photo would be on the web page of past winners.
So while we in the United States accept that a Supreme Court Justice who’s an “Ambassador” for the gun industry can ethically rule on cases that impact the very industry he represents, maybe in Old Europe, where the WFSA is located, they can still feel the sting of a little thing called shame.
(We are pleased to post the following press release from the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence).
For Immediate Release
Contact: Thom Mannard (312) 341-0939 / cell (847) 997-3020, tmannard@ichv.org
Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence Says Communities Must Have the Right and Authority to Enact Sensible Gun Laws to Save Lives and Protect Public Safety
(March 1, 2010, Chicago) – The Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence (ICHV) is sending a clear message to the U.S. Supreme Court that eliminating Chicago’s 28-year-old handgun ban will result in more gun suicides, homicides, and unintentional shootings. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in McDonald v. Chicago on Tuesday, March 2 over the fate of Chicago’s longstanding handgun ban.
Gun violence survivors, advocates and the city’s residents overwhelmingly support the ban and say that the law helps save lives. Instead of the Court using a deeply flawed reading of the Second Amendment and U.S. Constitution to potentially strip away Chicago’s ban, ICHV says that state and federal gun laws should be strengthened.
“Communities need the right and authority to address urgent public safety issues such as gun violence and the Court must not ignore or dismiss the longstanding and robust history of effective gun laws in this country for purely political or ideological reasons,†said Thom Mannard, Executive Director of ICHV. “Chicago’s handgun ban has been in effect for 28 years. Yet all of a sudden the gun lobby has completely manufactured a Court case with the sole intention of completely dismantling our nation’s gun laws for their own political, ideological and financial gain.â€
Nationwide an overwhelming majority of NRA members and gun owners support common sense gun laws. According to Frank Luntz’s polling on behalf of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, 69% of NRA members and 85% of gun owners support requiring background checks on firearm purchases at gun shows. In Illinois, 67% of NRA members support background checks for all handgun sales, with 42% strongly supporting the measure according to a statewide and bipartisan poll.
(See fact sheet here: http://www.icpgv.org/pdf/Gunowners.pdf).
“Americans are sensible when it comes to preventing gun violence and understand that gun restrictions are necessary both nationally and locally, such as Chicago’s handgun ban,†said Mannard.
The McDonald v. Chicago case is simply an extension of the gun lobby’s pervasive agenda to weaken all guns laws and assert that common sense gun restrictions somehow violate the Second Amendment. In 2008 the gun lobby convinced five conservative members of the Supreme Court to strike down D.C.’s handgun ban which dramatically reversed decades worth of legal precedent to suddenly claim there is an individual right to keep and bear arms.
Even before the Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Chicago’s handgun ban the gun lobby feels emboldened claiming the Second Amendment gives gun owners the “Constitutional right†to carry loaded guns in public, both openly and concealed, in government buildings, schools, parks, and shopping malls.
Americans should be gravely concerned about the possible outcome of the Court’s ruling.
–END–
According to the Washington Post on March 1st:
As a member of the Junior ROTC, teenager Antonin Scalia toted his rifle on the subway ride back and forth to Queens. As a hunter, he speaks lyrically of stalking wild turkeys. And as a justice, he may have reached the pinnacle of his more than two decades on the Supreme Court when he wrote the majority opinion that said the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own a firearm.
But when the justices on Tuesday confront the question of whether the amendment applies to state and local governments — not just the federal government and its enclaves, such as the District of Columbia — the court’s most prominent gun enthusiast faces something of a constitutional quandary.
The most likely path to recognizing gun ownership as a fundamental right is one that has been heavily criticized by Scalia and other conservative scholars, and it seems inconsistent with his belief that the Constitution should be interpreted in terms of its framers’ “original meaning.”
The alternative, one embraced by an unlikely coalition of libertarian, liberal and some conservative scholars and activists, would apply the Bill of Rights to the states in a way they say is more grounded in the Constitution. But it is also a route that could open what is invariably described as a Pandora’s box of additional rights of citizenship — health care, for instance, or housing.
The debate comes in McDonald v. Chicago, a case with great significance just on the gun-control front. A decision that states and cities may not infringe upon the right to own a firearm for self-defense could eventually call into question all manner of restrictions on gun ownership and registration, limits on who is eligible to own a gun and whether the carrying of weapons can be regulated.
On the surface, the issue would seem “easy as pie,” as Scalia sometimes breezily dismisses constitutional decisions that cause other justices deep consternation. It is a challenge of handgun bans in Chicago and the suburb of Oak Park, Ill., that are nearly identical to Washington’s restrictions struck by the court in 2008 in the landmark ruling District of Columbia v. Heller.
Most lawyers and scholars who follow the court think the cities have a losing hand; they say it is unlikely the five justices who made up the majority in Heller will decide that the right to own a firearm for self-protection exists only in a federal enclave. But the question of whether the Second Amendment applies to the states was specifically left unanswered in that case.
To most, it might seem illogical that the Bill of Rights would apply only to actions of the federal government, but that was its intent. Over the years, the court has said most of it applies — or in the court’s language is “incorporated” — through the 14th Amendment.
That post-Civil War amendment was meant to protect rights and outlaw discrimination. It forbade states to pass laws that abridged “the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” It said states may not “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” and guaranteed “equal protection of the laws.”
Mostly, the justices have used the “due process” clause to incorporate the majority of the Bill of Rights. The National Rifle Association and others have urged the court to continue to use it to incorporate the Second Amendment.
Reviving another clauseBut others, notably scholars from the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center and the libertarian Cato Institute, have urged the court to revive another clause from the 14th Amendment, the one that protects the “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” — 19th-century-speak for “rights.” An 1873 Supreme Court decision has buried the “privileges or immunities clause” by saying it covered only a narrow range of national rights, such as traveling to the capital.
The justices said in taking the McDonald case they would decide whether either clause incorporated the Second Amendment. And the exercise will provide interesting revelations.
The liberal dissenters in Heller will decide whether to continue their protest that the Second Amendment does not convey an individual right, or endorse Chicago’s position that federalism requires gun control decisions to be left to the states.
Justice Clarence Thomas, Scalia’s fellow originalist and another opponent of substantive due process, has signaled he is open to revisiting the privileges or immunities clause. And Justice Sonia Sotomayor, deemed by gun rights organizations as an enemy during her confirmation hearings despite a scant record on the subject, will be casting the first of what could be many votes on gun restrictions.
But Scalia’s situation is particularly interesting.
He is unquestionably the court’s most outspoken proponent of gun rights. He has lamented in speeches that gun ownership is too often linked with criminal behavior and his hunting trip with then-Vice President Cheney caused a national controversy. His love of the sport goes back to childhood, and he recently waxed about the challenge and allure of turkey hunting to journalist Joan Biskupic for her Scalia biography, “American Original.”
“Turkeys are very wily creatures. They have superb eyesight and they’re very cautious,” Scalia said. “You get one shot. If you miss, the whole day’s ruined.”
Scalia has been equally lethal on the subject of the due-process clause, which the court has invoked to protect substantive liberties, such as abortion rights and private relations between homosexuals. He protested as recently as last spring, when the court ruled that large campaign contributions to a judge could violate the due process rights of someone who had a case before that court.
“Divinely inspired text may contain the answers to all earthly questions,” Scalia wrote in dissent, “but the due process clause most assuredly does not.”
Such statements give heart to Doug Kendall of the Constitutional Accountability Center. “Justice Scalia has made a career out of promoting originalism and attacking substantive due process,” Kendall said. “How can he possibly embrace the due-process clause when originalism points so overwhelmingly to the privileges-or-immunities clause?”
Kendall’s group has submitted a brief that brings together constitutional theorists across the board, such as liberal Jack Balkin of Yale Law School and conservative Steven Calabresi of Northwestern, one of the founders of the Federalist Society. Alan Gura, the Alexandria lawyer who won the Heller case and represents the city residents and gun rights challengers in the current case, stresses the privileges or immunities clause as the proper place to locate Second Amendment rights.
‘Rooted in history’But even Calabresi notes that Scalia can justify recognizing the right under the due-process clause as one “deeply rooted in history and tradition.” Scalia has described himself at times as a “faint-hearted originalist,” and has said even mistaken doctrines of the court should be left in place when they are widely accepted and relied upon.
The NRA’s brief notes that relying on the due process clause in this case would allow the court to avoid overruling several previous decisions. And it references Scalia’s dissent from 1993 that says he is “willing to accept the proposition that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, despite its textual limitation to procedure, incorporates certain substantive guarantees specified in the Bill of Rights.”
In a speech to Yale law students in 1996, Scalia was apparently more colorful, but no more conclusive. The idea of substantive due process was “babble,” Scalia said, according to one report. On the other hand, the privileges-or-immunities clause was “flotsam,” he said.