| |
To our Gunguy brothers and sisters:
Send your Gun Guy and Gun Gal opinions to mailbag@gunguys.com.
NOTE: If
we feel like it, any email you send to Gun Guys may be published
with your name.
Don't hold your fire, we want to hear from you.
Sincerely,
Mike Magnum, Proprietor of Gunguys.com gun shop and liquor
emporium.
Chuch Heston
You know what's really sad is that I remember when Chuck Heston
was regarded as a well-paid and competent actor. How he got sidetracked
into this parody of himself is a lesson for all of us. He didn't
need the money or the fame--he just got lost I think. I hope before
he sinks into alzheimer's he has some lucid moments to reflect
and consider what he's done.
Rose Klassen
something you (or someone) should bring to attention...
A friend of a friend apparently just drove from Chicago to South
Carolina to buy a gun and kill himself in a hotel. Do South Carolina's
weak gun laws encourage "suicide tourism"?
Had he stayed
in Illinois, there would have been a waiting period, and he
might have been around people who could have helped, but once on
the
road to a easy background-check free, no waiting hand-gun,
there was no one who could even find him, 'til it was too late.
Apparently
he had an old felony on his record and shouldn't have even
been able to get a gun. (the felony was having possession of a
few
pills from his brothers ritalin prescription years ago)
It might be interesting to find out how many out-of-staters die
in south carolina with a recently purchased gun each year...
Andrew Gingery
Your site is great- keep it up! Is it just me (I know it sin't
since I've seen similar comments posted) but is the main argument
of the Gunnuts just a little bit crazy. The Second Amendment. They
take a Government document that purportedly supports their right
to be paranoid, and that is their main exhibit against the very
same Government from raping their women and castrating them?, not
necessarily in that order. Whaaaa??? Look- this is a very corrupt
Government right now, and maybe always was, but to blame sane people
who want sane policies about gun ownership and equate that with
potentially dangerous Government actions is ludicrous. Hey- wake
up! The US Government has been into some pretty shady crap for
a long time now, and do you think your little Magnum .57 or AK
47 is going to stop them when their tank or rocket equipped helicopter
is knocking at your door? I doubt it, and you should too.
Mike Carlson
overly passionate patriots
I, like many who contribute to your site, am a gun owner. I also,
however, advocate responsible gun ownership. I come from a family
of veterans with a long history of service in war for our country,
and I am thoroughly disgusted with the lack of cooperation between
Americans regarding this issue. It seems that both liberals and
conservatives are content to forecast doom with their slippery
slope arguments of 1. guns have no place in this country and people
will be constantly killed with our legal guns or 2. criminals are
all out to get us and we must remain perched at our door with our
eyes pried open ready to shoot intruders, and legal guns will fix
this. This is just a reflection of our American tendency to have
strong opinion, and our opinion can put us over a barrel in that
we may take a strange viewpoint just to refute an opposing position.
Let me settle this argument:
Conservatives, yes you really are psychos! You have the right
to own a gun, but responsible ownership means keeping it in a safe
and secure place until it is to be used. It seems that you people
actually WANT a criminal to break into your home, just so you can
experience the pleasure of killing a man. My grandfather was a
sergeant in the US Army during WWII, and had to kill to defend
our nation against the Axis. I was privy to many secrets prior
to his passing, one being that he was haunted everyday by the men
whose lives he took in war, and he regretted having to murder,
however noble our cause was. Any man who has truly had to kill
will never look forward to, or for that matter RELISH shooting
a man dead. To entertain your viewpoint, sometimes criminals do
break into homes, and if that should happen, by all means shoot
him down, but don't ever anticipate such an event by such irresponsible
actions as leaving out loaded guns or placing them under your pillows...
just having a gun vault with a lock is often the best measure.
And by the way, threatening others with death and politically-charged
epiphets does not make you a patriot, it only means you are SICK
and in need of help. You really should get in touch with your emotions.
Liberals... yes you really are pussies. We live in a country where
there are some seriously twisted people, and with guns at that.
Hell, just look at most of the contributors to this website. There
are "responsible" gun owners who seem to be using their
firearm for entertaining fantasies of coercion and death on their
fellow countrymen. You should arm yourselves on principle alone.
This place may be the good old US of A, but this is FAR from a
utopia. In England, guns are outlawed, but thugs with numerous
foreign monies and connections can easily get automatic weapons.
Where do you think this leaves normal people in the UK? Besides,
a gun can be a good thing to have for several reasons, among them
protection, hunting, and target-shooting. As for the drunken rednecks
who irresponsibly wave their firearms around whenever possible,
the statistics speak for themselves; in their own time these folks
will become a convincing argument for natural selection :). You
should realize that Rome wasn't built in a day, and your idealism
is beautiful, but a little misguided.
Bottom line: get a gun, store it RESPONSIBLY, use it when you
NEED it. Quit bitching about guns, because they won't go away.
Quit bitching about people who want to take away guns, because
(to reiterate) guns will never go away. This is the USA, and we
are still comrades, so love your AMERICAN brother, despite his
apparent mental problems. Maybe when we stop senselessly arguing
about the 2nd Amendment, we can turn our attention to the REAL
problem in the increasing destruction of our 1st Amendment rights
under our current administration. Take care America, you are all
in my prayers.
Yours truly,
Brian W. Castle
Shame!
You "Gun Guys," are a bunch of low-life provocateurs.
Shame!
Pete Lenz
Salt Lake City
The Night Before An NRA Christmas
Your piece posted "The Night Before An NRA Christmas" by
Michael Maher, Ammunition Clerk at Mike Magnum's Apple Valley,
CA...This piece truly sucks! While I purchase many and support
gun ownership, I won't be buying anything from anyone that posts
this kinda crap.
Hac Zr
Do the math
At current rates (19k murders per year) it will take our murderers
over 368 years to kill 7 million people. This is something that
the police officers and soldiers of the Third Reich accomplished
in less than decade.
Across his thiry-year career, Stalin killed anywhere from 10 million to 60
million of his own people. (It seems to me that most estimates range from 20
million to 40 million.) At their current rate, it will take our murderers anywhere
from 526 years to 3,157 years to duplicate this -- 1,052 years to 2,105 years,
if we stay with what I consider to be the more accurate stats.
The Khmer Rouge killed anywhere from 1 million to 3 million Cambodians, all
in something like four years, iirc. Since there were only 8 million Cambodians
to start with, they killed at least 12 percent of the population, and perhaps
as much as 37 percent. In our nation of 280 million people, that would be the
equivalent of anywhere from 33 million dead, to 100 million dead. It's something
our current murderers could accomplish only in 1,736 years to 5,263 years of
hard work.
Clearly, claims that the U.S. is the "Murder Capitol of the World," are
overblown. I figure it's a creation of a media that sells advertising space
by making us afraid to leave our homes. (If you do a search, you can find articles
mentioning that news ratings increased during the sniper attacks -- a period
of time when the news outlets all "forgot" to mention the extreme
unlikelyhood of getting shot by this guy.)
As for an armed population -- one that can possibly defend itself against future
Hitlers, Stalins, and Pol Pots -- I'm all for it. Yes, I understand the argument
that it would be pretty hard for a bunch of civilians with "pea shooters" to
defend themselves against the U.S. military, but the aforementioned tyrants
were never interested in totally destroying their people. Instead, they wanted
to control them through fear. (The title of one chapter in a bio on Stalin
is, "Terror by day, terror by night.")
An unarmed population can easily be made into slaves. Their homes, businesses,
and other property can be confiscated without much trouble. They themselves
can be harvested for hair, false teeth, eyeglasses, and implants. (One can
only guess why the Nazis burned the Jews, rather than send their remains to
rendering plants, to be made into chemicals, lipstick, and dog food. Do a search
on "rendering plants" for the rather gross details on how that industry
functions today.)
All a tyrant can do to an armed population is destroy them -- and there's no
profit in that.
Kirk Thrasher
Kirk, I don't know what planet you live on, but this country
is quite heavily armed and the population STILL is a mental slave
to post 9-11 fears, all of which the Bush administration plays
like a cheap accordian to keep you occupied while they rob the
bank. - Mike
Hunting accident in Georgia
About 2 weeks ago, in rural Georgia, a boy accidentally shot and
killed his father while they were deer hunting. The boy, age 11,
saw a movement and thought it was a deer. It was his Dad.
I live in Georgia...(not by choice) where owning guns and hunting is "Mah
heritage."
And the beat goes on.
Jeanpoop
More Mail
|
|
 |